Source: Vladimir Rogov, member of the Main Council of the Civil-Military Administration of the Zaporozhye region - https://t.me/vrogov
I uploaded to catbox the video material mentioned as being located here:
- https://files.catbox.moe/ace445.mp4
- https://files.catbox.moe/k7vngk.mp4
- https://files.catbox.moe/zzrya4.MP4
⚡️🇺🇸🇬🇧Bucha massacre Part-I
The National Guard of Ukraine filmed its entering into the town north of Kiev where the alleged massacre took place: https://t.me/vrogov/2348?single
They were first in the town after the withdrawal of Russian troops.
The video clearly shows no dead bodies on the streets.
That casts serious doubts on the later claims of Russian involvement in killings of civilians. Most probably, the following Ukrainian troops shot them as reprisals for the unloyal.
⚡️⚡️🇺🇸🇬🇧Bucha massacre Part-II
On the 31st of March, the Mayor of Bucha Anatoliy Fedoruk announced that the town was again under full control of the Ukranian government: https://t.me/vrogov/2348
The relevant video was posted by «Ukraine 24» channel on the 1st of April.
There was not a signle word on any dead bodies on the streets of the town in the video.
Zhan Beleniuk, a deputy of the Ukrainian parliament, also reported about visiting Bucha after regaining control by the Ukrainian government.
No dead bodies on the streets were mentioned. Both statements were made in a joyful manner without any reservations about atrocities.
The group of Sergey Korotkih was in Bucha on the 1st or the 2nd of April. Again, he made no reference to murder of civilians.
The claim of alleged killings of local civilians by the Russian forces came noticeably later.
It would be absolutely impossible not to notice numerous dead bodies on the streets for those who made initial reports from Bucha.
The dead bodies appeared on the streets much later after the Russian withdrawal from the town.
⚡️⚡️⚡️🇺🇸🇬🇧Bucha massacre Part-III
To understand video materials from Bucha, it is necessary to know the "friend-or-foe" markings used by belligerents in Ukraine: https://t.me/vrogov/2348
The Ukrainian forces use either blue or yellow armlets or stripes (colored adhesive tape, ribbons, etc.). The Russian forces - red or white.
Because members of Ukrainian militia don't always wear military uniforms, local civilians in Bucha wore white stripes on their upper arms when the Russian forces were stationed in Bucha.
That was done to prevent misidentification of civilians as members of the militia.
When the Ukrainian forces entered the town they fired at the people with white stripes, thus killing the civilians.
The video shows a conversation between members of Ukrainian units from a "Boatsman boys" squad.
One of them asks if he can shoot at the people without blue stripes. The other confirms that it can be done (with an expletive).
So the shooting at the civilians was done by Ukrainian units.
Here is a "And We Know" video, go to the 22:45 mark. One of the corpses was waving his hand, another was getting up off the ground after the cameras rolled past. It was staged.
https://rumble.com/vzo3ml-4.4.22-courageous-leaders-stepping-up-major-victories-on-the-earth-many-had.html
Sorry. The hand movement was a refracted image from a rain drop that was moving down the camera lens, and the "getting up" image was an effect of the mirror's edge curvature (fisheye lens effect causes image to foreshorten). This doesn't mean the scenario was entirely as presented, however. We have to be careful to discard false explanations. Plenty of true material available.
Wrong, the camera that caught the hand moving was inside a vehicle. You can see the dashboard of the vehicle and the windshield. There were no water drops anywhere on the lens or there would be blurry spots in other fields of the video image. Why are making up lies?
You can see a sticker on the windshield to the right of the screen. There are no water drops on the windshield from the rain and the wipers are not on.
I am going to flag your handshake account; we do not need misinformation infilTRAITORS here.
Then it was the windshield, which makes more sense. All it takes is one drop. If there is only one drop, would anyone bother to have wipers on? I live in Puget Sound where we have multiple words for rain. If I had to activate my wipers for every solitary raindrop, I would go nuts. I have seen that optical effect myself. A raindrop on the windshield is like a spherical lens.
I apologize for my poor recollection of the discussion by Gonzalo Lira, who backtracked over that video quite a bit to determine what was going on. He identified the culprit as a raindrop on the windshield and I misrecalled his deduction. He is also a film director and knows his optics. And he is NOT an apologist for the Ukranian Nazis, nor am I, so don't get your panties in a twist. There is a strong tendency in this audience to let confirmation bias overrule honesty. Which is somewhat evidenced by your boorish hostility toward a non-conspiratorial assessment of decidedly poor images. But be sure your flag reads "I'm pissed off at this guy because he makes mistakes and does not confirm my bias." You wouldn't want to lie, would you?
Like I said, there are no rain drops on the windshield. None!!! You were caught lying and now changing your story. THERE ARE NO RAINDROPS ON THE WINDSHIELD.
The persons hand moves the distance of a couple feet. A random raindrop will not cause just the hand to move, the entire corpse would move. Your explanation does not make sense. I don't know who you are referencing, it is obvious disinformation to cover up the truth, I believe what my eyes show me.
"Stong tendency in this audience"? Are you separating yourself from the rest of us? Sounds like you just did. What makes you different? Perhaps party affiliation?
"non-conspiratorial assessment of decidedly poor images"? If your original assessment includes obviously fake facts, how is that non-conspiratorial? You admit you were wrong. I would conclude the only thing poor here was YOUR assessment. No, I would go further than that, not just poor, misleading.
Boorish Hostility? "I'm pissed"? No, I was just pointing out you were lying, that is all. It is common practice for liberals to start throwing around unfounded claims once they have been outed, raise your hand if this applies to you.
Thanks, I saw that video on the chans but failed to download it. Glad someone did.