Yup, this happens to me aaaallllllllllll the time!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (149)
sorted by:
I still disagree. If someone is willing to listen, even if they end up disagreeing, or otherwise finding an excuse to hold onto the narrative, it STILL primes them for future questioning of the narrative. So in this case, "the point" would be to help them survive what is coming.
Our job is to do exactly that. It's not about "proving" any particular point. It's not about Trump, or Pizza/Russia/Obama/Clinton/Whatever gate. It's not about the vaccine (though in this case, it could save lives). It's not about masks, or Critical Race Theory, or Gender Confusion, or anything. It is about surviving what is coming. It is about not being in the 4-6%.
The point of doing the work is not for you, or for any of those points, but for them; even if they don't realize it yet.
Yes, and every time they are forced to use that circular logic to appease the cognitive dissonance, it primes them for future evidence that doesn't fit their world view; that isn't quite right based on their own experience. I have seen this happen myself. A person will barely acknowledge the evidence, working it back into the narrative, but then future things, that they have personal knowledge of, that don't fit the narrative are questioned, and awakening happens.
Hell, this is pretty much exactly how my initial awakening happened. I knew about all sorts of shit that was fucked up. I knew that 911 was likely an inside job. I knew that the Patriot Act was FUBAR. I knew that Benghazi stunk to high heaven, that Clinton was evil as fuck and a pathological liar, and that the media was saying non-truths (I didn't realize at the time it was actual lies (aka Intentional non-truths, I thought it was just excessive bias)) but it never occurred to me that there might be a bigger picture; a deeper fraud; an intentional Matrix.
It wasn't until the election that I was forced to dig deeper. I was never really a fan of Trump. I knew the media was lying about him for five years, and I knew his policies were actually pretty good, but I found him to be arrogant and annoying. Little did I know at the time why he spoke the way he spoke (reinforcement of facts to counter brainwashing, speaking in code, etc.). Regardless, I voted for him, because... Joe Biden??? But I didn't really care about the outcome that much. When he started losing I thought, Oh well, it can't be worse than Obama, or Bush.
But I have done a lot of data analysis in my life. I have done a lot of experimental measurements, including on large data sets and large populations. The election data was wrong. It was screaming at me. I started digging. I worked on it about 20 hours a day for a month. I proved mathematically a hundred ways from Sunday that the election data was fraudulent, in multiple states. After I had proven that to myself. After I realized it was possible that there could be a conspiracy on that level, THEN I started digging into other things in earnest.
It wasn't until it was numerical data, one of my specialties, that I made the connection. But the other fuckery I had seen before primed me to see it.
That is what I mean. Willing to listen. Some people just hear, but they don't listen.
No one gets to decide what OUR job is. That is a personal decision what role we decide to take. If that is a role you want to take then that is your decision.
If that is the role YOU want to take on, then that is your choice. I don't like someone telling me what my job or role is for me. I define that myself. I would encourage people to think for themselves and listen to their own instincts on what they think will best help.
That's good that you helped someone awaken, but understand that it is not a role that is for everyone. If you feel your way of doing things works for you, then go for it. However, I do not view it that way.
I'm glad to hear you did your own digging. That's what I did and that's what has opened my eyes. However, every take will be different. Not everyone will get to the same point by the same way.
It sounds to me that your job is over. The foundation of this movement is laid. It's time to build the walls and build the rest of the house by teaching others, sharing easily understood concepts and EDUCATING the masses. You clearly aren't interested in that. You want to decode and hang out in the deep part of the pool with other veterans and feel good about yourselves. Well congratulations on your part in laying the foundation. Please recognize we don't need to train up more people who do nothing but decode. We need interpreters now. If you decline that role, then that's your choice. Please don't expect normies to do all the work you have done. The work has been done. We need teachers to share it.
I would say it's very silly to try and put things in a box like that and declare yourself the expert on what others need.
You're essentially saying "You're not needed," based on your own opinion. There are many who need all types. Why are you trying to push others out?
I'm raising the issue that we have so much information that people seem to refuse to prove and share to normies because they get frustrated and don't have the patience to do so. It's unrealistic for everyone to have to go back and decode every post like the veterans did. That part is important but the foundation is laid. More items is important but not critical. What is critical is to have more people understand this is about truth and justice, not some weird cult about bigfoot or whatever. It needs to be able to be explained in a patient and logically supported manner. Like a classroom teacher teaching kids about multiplication.
I meant what Q intended for our job to be within the scope of Q's declas and purpose. Of course your life is your own.
That really wasn't my intent. I worded it poorly.
On this I disagree. The counter to brainwashing is to expose the fraud in a personal way. Everyone is an expert at something. When the narrative is contrary to expert knowledge, the narrative is questioned. This is a ubiquitous response. So while the starting point of each path is not the same at all, the shape, style, and direction of all paths out of The Matrix are the same.