Instead of just constantly shutting her down every time she opens her mouth, wouldn't it be beneficial to let her spew out whatever nonsense she's been coached to say so that you can get an accurate representation of the misrepresentation? Seems like.
The only thing I learned from this whole video is that guy seems to hate the sound of her voice. That's all. When if he would have just let her go on for 3-5 minutes he could have tied the whole thing up in a nice self-incriminating tangleweb.
That's also what makes me suspect videos like this are about theater, not justice, because those people are way smarter than me, and definitely know what they're doing and saying.
He is simply cutting off from her rehearsed "Public Health Purposes" narrative. He is trying to get her to admit that the labs are for military purpose.
It worked because he got her to admit that it was for "defensive military" purpose and exposed her twisted logic that "Military personal have public health needs as well so therefore stating that it is for public health purposes encompasses military purpose" bs
You are too used to American "journalists" that give out their questions 3 days in advance and make sure they are preapproved and won't upset anyone
You might be right, even though I think I'm just too used to it all being propaganda (even stuff that seems to "agree" with me) and to be viewed as entertainment only, because the minute you fall for one scam, that's when your whole worldview is disregarded because you've proven your gullibility.
Is that sad? Absolutely. But here we are.
Look at them poor saps on reddit, falling for video game footage. You think anybody takes their opinions on any 'current events' seriously outside of their circle-jerk crowd after that?
So I'll be over here with my grain of salt and my mustard seed, thenk yeeeew.
When if he would have just let her go on for 3-5 minutes
Unlikely that they would have that kinda time on their hands tho. He had to make it as very quick as possible, and as very brutal as possible given the show format's limitations. Which I personally find that he handled surprisingly well.
Oh he walked all over her! He let her state her position and then he destroyed it with prepared evidence. Maybe he's been watching lawyers.
Beautiful to see these rats squirm
The rats, they get rat-tled.
The sheep, herded like cattle.
The jab, that's the battle.
From Sichuan, to Seattle.
Oh my, I see you have discovered unicode now, lol... I've never in my entire life seen as serious case in text formatting madness.
It's so hard to read!
He's just posting to feed his addiction, now. At least two of his posts said the storm is here (it is not)
Instead of just constantly shutting her down every time she opens her mouth, wouldn't it be beneficial to let her spew out whatever nonsense she's been coached to say so that you can get an accurate representation of the misrepresentation? Seems like.
The only thing I learned from this whole video is that guy seems to hate the sound of her voice. That's all. When if he would have just let her go on for 3-5 minutes he could have tied the whole thing up in a nice self-incriminating tangleweb.
That's also what makes me suspect videos like this are about theater, not justice, because those people are way smarter than me, and definitely know what they're doing and saying.
He is simply cutting off from her rehearsed "Public Health Purposes" narrative. He is trying to get her to admit that the labs are for military purpose. It worked because he got her to admit that it was for "defensive military" purpose and exposed her twisted logic that "Military personal have public health needs as well so therefore stating that it is for public health purposes encompasses military purpose" bs
You are too used to American "journalists" that give out their questions 3 days in advance and make sure they are preapproved and won't upset anyone
You might be right, even though I think I'm just too used to it all being propaganda (even stuff that seems to "agree" with me) and to be viewed as entertainment only, because the minute you fall for one scam, that's when your whole worldview is disregarded because you've proven your gullibility.
Is that sad? Absolutely. But here we are.
Look at them poor saps on reddit, falling for video game footage. You think anybody takes their opinions on any 'current events' seriously outside of their circle-jerk crowd after that?
So I'll be over here with my grain of salt and my mustard seed, thenk yeeeew.
Unlikely that they would have that kinda time on their hands tho. He had to make it as very quick as possible, and as very brutal as possible given the show format's limitations. Which I personally find that he handled surprisingly well.