I dony give a flying fuck what you think,.i post what i want to post if you dont like it fuck off,.Hal Turner is not the only one posting about it,..its even reported on IsraeliNewsLive,..and on other sites,.go do your research instead of trying to judge others,..
There is no judgement, just observation and the question remains: when has Hall Turner ever been correct? The question comes from my own observation over the course of the last 20 odd years.
As far as your posting, I did not mention that. Personally, I am quite happy to see all kinds of postings. Some are with a value towards the Q posts, others more geared towards being posted on the current affairs. I agree, even a lie contains some truth. Why, are you projecting the question about Hall Turner onto yourself? Are you Hall Turner? No? Then why?
Rightly or wrongly, since you refuse to look into that, the question has to be posed: are you dealing with a classic case of cognitive dissonance? For.looking in the mirror onto yourself can be a very challenging act.
I post what i want i dont need you tell me what to post ,.a member posted about "doomers" and described what to look for and how to spot them and you seem just like he was explaining,.".im on here to post what i want not to have someone tell me what to post,.,.I was in Vietnam from 1969-1973,.15 mnths of that time was in Millitary intelligence,.So i was fighting a war while you were still sucking on you mothers tits,I check things over I know what to look for,..and cross reference ,so i dont need some punk to tell me where or who i should post from,...No one can be 100% sure no matter where you post from,..!
I post what i want i dont need you tell me what to post
And right you are. It serves the interest of this interaction to point out, this was never at issue. I honor your right to post whatever you want. Your choice. A1 and that sort of thing.
a member posted about "doomers" and described what to look for and how to spot them and you seem just like he was explaining,
If you conclude such, feel free to do so, I care not. Yet, if this is dooming in your book, my goodness, do not read an actual "doomer"-post. It will kill you. There is a slight difference between "doomer" and "boomer". Perhaps superfluous of me to point out.
But in the interest of closure, how is it dooming when I am questioning Hall Turner screaming wolf=dooming, the sky is falling?(rhetorical question).
I was in Vietnam from 1969-1973,.15 mnths.....Millitary intelligence
This piece of information may or may not be factual.
Really, MI? And this piece of information you offered, that may or may not be true, is offered in the pursuit of what, exactly?
Are you now seriously putting a label of trust on this Hall Turner as a source? Should I then take the fact, you are viewing and using him as a serious source, as confirmation that it conveys any shimmer of relevancy or trustworthiness on him? Or... how about turning that question around: what does it tell us about you when you take him this serious, while he is constantly running wild and crying wolf .... and wrong for it, Mr. Intelligence?
So i was fighting a war while you were still sucking on you mothers tits
Floating a balloon, Mr. Intelligence, based on your own bubble. You have no way of knowing this. However, if I had the choice back then, I would choose my mother's tits over an unjust dirty war waged for corporate profits. But I guess we all have the right to be a sucker, once.
And besides, apart from whether or not you have done actual fighting at all, which I cannot confirm or deny, how is that relevant to the question at hand? We are talking about the reliability of a source, not your waging an unjust war for corporate profits prowess, yes?
Example: A certain source told a former MI6 agent that a certain presidential candidate, and subsequent president of the USA-INC, had been in Moscow and had specifically spent the night in the same room as the previous president of the USA-INC, called Punking Hussein, and had engaged in a "golden shower" with prostitutes.
What was actual fact, and what was fictious?
We all know how that story ended up being reshuffled and interjected into the I.C.-community. Of course with a high level of confidence ....(of course that confidence level related to the act of interjecting. [/cynical]).
I check things over I know what to look for
if you say so ....and so did ... eh .... Buzzfeed and FBI and 17 I.C.-agencies. They knew exactly what to look for.
and cross reference
Against what? If anything has been clear these last 7 years: Intelligence is a nice name disguising the echo-chamber and un-intelligence.
,so i dont need some punk to tell me where or who i should post from
Again, this was not part of what I wrote, neither implicit or explicit, as it is about the qualities of Hall Turner as a source. Yet, you seem to take it personally for quite a particular reason, as I mentioned in an earlier post.
No one can be 100% sure no matter where you post from,..!
Agree, and between 99,9% and 0% is a world of confirmation and logic.
A lot of people on the net use HT,.the fact that what i post is on several channels,Monkey werkz post nearly a whole story on it,.if you think its false then post what you have to show its false,.show your evidence that its false ,this site is supposed to be about helping people but people like you like to put others down,.and i call them doomers,.If i want to use Hal Turner and alot of people do,.even Dan Bongino,s show commented on Hal Turner,...then thats my right,. I have seen several posts on here from HT and BIN ,2 sites people like to doom and yet if you take the same story on those sites,and say post it from from Bitchute, or Rumble ,.its fine,.its belivable,..Its just the names of the Sites people go by,.I have never put down anyones posts on here ever,never called bullshit or fake,.if i have not heard the story I will just move on an thats all you need to do,.I have worked in Mil,Intel,.So with all thats going on right now,.theres is no way anyone can post anything with 100% certainty its the Truth,.So dont go around acting like a know it all,..read a post ,not sure move on ,..thats what i do,..Respect what people post,..,
Please, think logically. The discussion is not about whether or not there were CCP military planes.
The issue is what he is proposing it would mean.
As I already indicated, Serbia buys drones and other military equipment from CCP, just as much as they buy from India and Russia. These come in batches in pre-arranged contracted times. Nothing nefarious about it.
But no, Hall is running with it and screaming bloody murder. This is what he has been doing for years. .....
Logical question then has to be asked: how trustworthy as a source is he?
and what was he screaming " blue murder" about,.look at the details, as to why is it happening now,..when was the last time they brought anything from China? its not as if Chnese Troops drop in for a cup of tea everyday,.The last time Serbia had anything to do with China was in 1999 when the US and Nato bombed the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade,.So all of a sudden thes a war on in Ukraine and the China Drops in Paratroopers,.and Surface to air Missiles,and a now preparing a millitary base, Hal Turner has every right to be talking about it,.because its now gone mainstream in Europe so Hal Turner Right again In fact it was a Leading story on Yahoo,.
I dony give a flying fuck what you think,.i post what i want to post if you dont like it fuck off,.Hal Turner is not the only one posting about it,..its even reported on IsraeliNewsLive,..and on other sites,.go do your research instead of trying to judge others,..
and on a scale of 1-10 your brain is about -0 ..you seem like one of these "doomer" cunts everyones talking about,...
https://nz.news.yahoo.com/china-makes-delivery-missiles-serbia-154149234.html,..on a scale of 1-10,..what would Hal Turner be now,.a 10..its being reported everywhere even here in NZ,...!
Think logically. That is what I want for you.
There is no judgement, just observation and the question remains: when has Hall Turner ever been correct? The question comes from my own observation over the course of the last 20 odd years.
As far as your posting, I did not mention that. Personally, I am quite happy to see all kinds of postings. Some are with a value towards the Q posts, others more geared towards being posted on the current affairs. I agree, even a lie contains some truth. Why, are you projecting the question about Hall Turner onto yourself? Are you Hall Turner? No? Then why?
Rightly or wrongly, since you refuse to look into that, the question has to be posed: are you dealing with a classic case of cognitive dissonance? For.looking in the mirror onto yourself can be a very challenging act.
I post what i want i dont need you tell me what to post ,.a member posted about "doomers" and described what to look for and how to spot them and you seem just like he was explaining,.".im on here to post what i want not to have someone tell me what to post,.,.I was in Vietnam from 1969-1973,.15 mnths of that time was in Millitary intelligence,.So i was fighting a war while you were still sucking on you mothers tits,I check things over I know what to look for,..and cross reference ,so i dont need some punk to tell me where or who i should post from,...No one can be 100% sure no matter where you post from,..!
And right you are. It serves the interest of this interaction to point out, this was never at issue. I honor your right to post whatever you want. Your choice. A1 and that sort of thing.
If you conclude such, feel free to do so, I care not. Yet, if this is dooming in your book, my goodness, do not read an actual "doomer"-post. It will kill you. There is a slight difference between "doomer" and "boomer". Perhaps superfluous of me to point out. But in the interest of closure, how is it dooming when I am questioning Hall Turner screaming wolf=dooming, the sky is falling?(rhetorical question).
This piece of information may or may not be factual.
Really, MI? And this piece of information you offered, that may or may not be true, is offered in the pursuit of what, exactly?
Are you now seriously putting a label of trust on this Hall Turner as a source? Should I then take the fact, you are viewing and using him as a serious source, as confirmation that it conveys any shimmer of relevancy or trustworthiness on him? Or... how about turning that question around: what does it tell us about you when you take him this serious, while he is constantly running wild and crying wolf .... and wrong for it, Mr. Intelligence?
Floating a balloon, Mr. Intelligence, based on your own bubble. You have no way of knowing this. However, if I had the choice back then, I would choose my mother's tits over an unjust dirty war waged for corporate profits. But I guess we all have the right to be a sucker, once.
And besides, apart from whether or not you have done actual fighting at all, which I cannot confirm or deny, how is that relevant to the question at hand? We are talking about the reliability of a source, not your waging an unjust war for corporate profits prowess, yes?
Example: A certain source told a former MI6 agent that a certain presidential candidate, and subsequent president of the USA-INC, had been in Moscow and had specifically spent the night in the same room as the previous president of the USA-INC, called Punking Hussein, and had engaged in a "golden shower" with prostitutes.
What was actual fact, and what was fictious? We all know how that story ended up being reshuffled and interjected into the I.C.-community. Of course with a high level of confidence ....(of course that confidence level related to the act of interjecting. [/cynical]).
if you say so ....and so did ... eh .... Buzzfeed and FBI and 17 I.C.-agencies. They knew exactly what to look for.
Against what? If anything has been clear these last 7 years: Intelligence is a nice name disguising the echo-chamber and un-intelligence.
Agree, and between 99,9% and 0% is a world of confirmation and logic.
A lot of people on the net use HT,.the fact that what i post is on several channels,Monkey werkz post nearly a whole story on it,.if you think its false then post what you have to show its false,.show your evidence that its false ,this site is supposed to be about helping people but people like you like to put others down,.and i call them doomers,.If i want to use Hal Turner and alot of people do,.even Dan Bongino,s show commented on Hal Turner,...then thats my right,. I have seen several posts on here from HT and BIN ,2 sites people like to doom and yet if you take the same story on those sites,and say post it from from Bitchute, or Rumble ,.its fine,.its belivable,..Its just the names of the Sites people go by,.I have never put down anyones posts on here ever,never called bullshit or fake,.if i have not heard the story I will just move on an thats all you need to do,.I have worked in Mil,Intel,.So with all thats going on right now,.theres is no way anyone can post anything with 100% certainty its the Truth,.So dont go around acting like a know it all,..read a post ,not sure move on ,..thats what i do,..Respect what people post,..,
https://nz.news.yahoo.com/china-makes-delivery-missiles-serbia-154149234.html.//...So maybe Hal Turner was right about something ..huh...!
Please, think logically. The discussion is not about whether or not there were CCP military planes.
The issue is what he is proposing it would mean.
As I already indicated, Serbia buys drones and other military equipment from CCP, just as much as they buy from India and Russia. These come in batches in pre-arranged contracted times. Nothing nefarious about it.
But no, Hall is running with it and screaming bloody murder. This is what he has been doing for years. .....
Logical question then has to be asked: how trustworthy as a source is he?
and what was he screaming " blue murder" about,.look at the details, as to why is it happening now,..when was the last time they brought anything from China? its not as if Chnese Troops drop in for a cup of tea everyday,.The last time Serbia had anything to do with China was in 1999 when the US and Nato bombed the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade,.So all of a sudden thes a war on in Ukraine and the China Drops in Paratroopers,.and Surface to air Missiles,and a now preparing a millitary base, Hal Turner has every right to be talking about it,.because its now gone mainstream in Europe so Hal Turner Right again In fact it was a Leading story on Yahoo,.