This post is being made primarily in the interest of all new users and curious visitors to this place. In that there are many of the negatively-oriented variety who have blended in amongst us all in here, so to speak. This is primarily so because these ones know for a fact that all of the sneaky little tricks that they use and utilize on all of the other controlled, bought, and thoroughly manipulated forms of mass and social media simply would not work in here. And yet, it is surprisingly easy to tell these ones apart. And I'm going to tell you all just how.
It's surprisingly SIMPLE: Nearly everything they write is full of negativity, fear, hatred, fear-mongering, dooming, negative or doomsday type predictions, war-mongering, anger, rage, (covertly or overtly expressed) disappointment, and other made-up depressing shit.
In other words, if reading a post or comment makes you feel unnecessarily sad, mad, depressed, anxious, scared, panicky, hopeless, or even helpless --- congratulations, you've spotted a well blended in SHILL.
Because you see, it's not that difficult at all to pretend to be one of us. But when push comes to shove, these ones' masks come off.
So the next time you encounter absolutely any of them, ask them the following questions. And then, enjoy the free flow of salt as they struggle and squirm to answer even as much as a single question satisfactorily. For these ones are no different than your average household cockroaches or lizards, for their darkness-party ENDS the very MOMENT you turn on the LIGHT. So go switch on that light, by asking them to answer why:
QUESTION ONE: If the dark ones are truly winning, how come they STILL haven't been able to start off their dream project known as World War 3? It's been well over an entire month since that whole Ukraine madness started. You'd think someone truly powerful would've got that shit started full power by now.
QUESTION TWO: Where even are the dreaded 5G rollouts that were (well more than) supposed to be here by now? Forget globally, they haven't even been able to get that shit working locally. Doesn't look all that much like "winning" to me!
QUESTION THREE: If they were indeed that much powerful, how in the actual fuck is the Hunter Biden laptop story now mainstream instead of being hidden for good?
QUESTION FOUR: Why IS the entire world still not masked up, locked down, fully vaxxed, and thoroughly under NWO governance even after, what's it been like, 2 whole years of the whole plandemic restriction-setting and propagandas?
QUESTION FIVE: How in the world is Joe Rogan STILL walking around freely, still having a 20 million listener podcast and all, and STILL NOT cancelled by the "powerful" and "winning" commie elite?
QUESTION SIX: How the fuck were they even unable to prevent some random Tweeter from leaking the Ukraine Biolabs story? And beyond even that, how in the actual fuck did that story even become Actually. Fucking. MAINSTREAM??
"All powerful" and "winning" elite? Pfft, gimme a FUCKING break.
QUESTION SEVEN: If the elite were actually winning, why the fuck would some of the very BIGGEST paedo celebs out there upon our planet just, well --- Start. Utterly. Vanishing? And I'm not even SAYING THAT, folks --- ELON Motherfucking MUSK is.
Also, speaking of Mr. Musk, isn't it rather surprising just how much hate he's been getting on here, lately? And for what, dropping redpill bombs all over the place? Isn't that supposed to be a good thing regardless of what side he's even on? Even stranger, is that he's still getting hate even after buying that stake in Twitter. Which is super fucking surprising to me because, why the FUCK would the Black Hats have Elon buy Twitter (assuming he's working for them here), when @Jack has already been doing a supremely stellar job at the whole mass censorship and dissent-culling routine? Doesn't the very idea contradict itself? I mean, the guy banned Donald J Trump for fucksake; why would he even need a "better" replacement? Unless of course, Twitter is not just 9.2% under White Hat control, but instead, a whole ONE HUNDRED PERCENT by now.
Now, I'm not necessarily saying here that Elon Musk is a confirmed White Hat or anything, but, if he's a Black Hat, then, all of that LOGIC simply DOES NOT ADD UP. Besides, all of the liberals and commies and all of their news outlets have been busy tearing him down 24x7x366 --- and for many, many, months now. When was the last time those ones were up to any good? And, beyond even that, when was the last time people on here were in agreement with these mainstream agenda-pusher ones? So Elon Musk getting hate ON HERE for, quite literally, RED-PILLING THE ENTIRE FUCKING PLANET simply DOES NOT add up or compute for me. And neither does the idea of people on here so perfectly agreeing with the MSM and Liberal narratives --- so I must then suspect that great shilling is afoot.
Now I know for a fact that some people on here will then bring up Neuralink, which is perfectly a valid counterpoint to this all. But then hey, you know what, even Trump pushed for vaccines openly. You gonna hold him up to the exact same standards now? Or is that move then recognized as just an "act?" Pick ONE. Fucking. CHOICE.
In conclusion, BEWARE OF THOSE who are only and ONLY here to DISCOURAGE and DISSUADE you from being fully awakened and spreading the word about it. Also, BEWARE OF THOSE who are way too much in agreement with a mainstream point of view on things, and especially so when the said viewpoint is just highly, HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE (to say the very least!) Not telling you to either trust or not trust either Trump or Musk or absolutely whoever else, but be very, VERY wary of those who look all too keen on pushing a narrative, and those who use deflection, deception, and other illogical shit to push you towards doom and gloom. Because the Great Awakening is very much so ALIVE AND ACTIVE, and, dare I even say THRIVING (to say the very least!)
NO SHILL CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING.
NONE WHOSOEVER.
Enjoy the show.
WWG1WGA
A forum is like a home. Not everyone is allowed to come into your home. That is not a Right that people have. It is not about "free speech" it's about invitation to a personal space. We don't have the Right to invade someone's personal space.
This discrimination does not extend to public forums though. Within the public forum, if someone wants to talk about Drag Racing or Toenail Clippings they have the absolute Right to do so. That is Freedom of Speech, because it is not a private venue. There is no invitation required. All are invited, because the conversation is about the Social Contract which applies to all. This is exactly what the filibuster is.
Freedom of speech, only exists within the sphere of places for which there is no invitation required to join, or if it is a public space, for which there is no agent contractually bound to manage it. (Social Contract, not city/state contract. This is the difference between a Constitution and "laws").
The distinction here is "space" and "invitation." In the case of the private forum, or the public forum under contractual invitation, there is a space that is being violated by behavior that is not a part of the invitation.
However, any acts of discrimination are a very tricky subject. In the case of a topical forum, I would suggest that asking someone to stay on topic is the best first step. If that does not occur, ignoring someone is likely the best second step. Banning should be an absolute last resort imo. Those are my personal views, because I have seen what can happen in a free forum to change a persons mind with patience and understanding, but that is not about the Rights. No one has the Right to come into your home and talk about Drag Racing; because it's your home.
If there is no contractual bounds on speech within a public forum, then removal for any speech is a violation which must be dealt with in another way such as debate. If all else fails, an end to the meeting may be the only way. It can reconvene in a private venue where "free speech" does not apply.
Of course in a private venue, no votes can be had, no laws can be made, etc. So it's tricky, but I suggest it leads to far less fuckery than any other path.
And here's the thing. No they aren't. They are the opposite of off topic. They are exactly the topics we need to engage in. If we debate these topics, the results of those debates teach us how to form excellent debate responses to the exact same topics that come up in the outside world. There is nothing better than engaging in such debates to bring about the GA. This board's primary purpose is about the GA. The primary path to the GA is through debate of these topics. Silencing these topics keeps us weak, and unprepared for our main purpose (or at least my main purpose, one I believe I share with many others) which is to help others transition into a better world. To keep them alive and safe during this war for our minds.
You can't counter the brainwashing in others unless you practice countering that brainwashing.
Beyond that, such topics are reasonable. This is a disinformation war. There is no way to win such a war if we can't talk about anything related. The topics you are listing are undeniably related, they just may not be in agreement with Q, or your interpretation of Q.
Should such people really be silenced? Or should they be debated? Silencing keeps us weak, and helps no one. The strength of the mind is increased through debate, not censorship. Silencing dissenting views is a victory condition for the Cabal. It is the worst thing we can possibly do here.
If someone wants to talk about Drag Racing or Toenail Clippings, the door is over there, but if they want to talk about how Q is a psyop, or whatever they want to talk about that relates to the GA, or the war on The Minds of Men, then they absolutely should do so on this forum. We are well equipped to handle the debate. That debate will provide evidence for all to use in the war outside.
Every time I have ever spoken about moderation (which is not THIS topic, so I'm not sure where this is coming from, but whatever) I have said explicitly that AI is not allowed. "Moderation as a last resort" does not extend to banning AI. Obviously computers have no Rights posting on a Human board.
I suggest that debate is the strongest path out of such behavior, but I recognize that it is not always reasonable to adhere to that path in the strictest sense. I suggest it as a guiding principle, not an absolute. This is about invitation, not 1A.
The problem that I was addressing in my OP in this particular thread was one of categorizing people as "shills", "doomers", etc. THAT drives division. Most "shill" or "doomer" posts are actually just people, not hired thugs or AIs. When we categorize them, and silence them, we harm them, and we harm the community.
The community is based on research and debate. Shunning or silencing such people, who are just trying to talk about their thoughts as they relate to the war is the opposite of what we need to do to win it. The GA is about unification (We The People) and freedom of thought / life. Silencing people because they dissent is the opposite of the GA, and thus should be the opposite of the GA.win.