This post is being made primarily in the interest of all new users and curious visitors to this place. In that there are many of the negatively-oriented variety who have blended in amongst us all in here, so to speak. This is primarily so because these ones know for a fact that all of the sneaky little tricks that they use and utilize on all of the other controlled, bought, and thoroughly manipulated forms of mass and social media simply would not work in here. And yet, it is surprisingly easy to tell these ones apart. And I'm going to tell you all just how.
It's surprisingly SIMPLE: Nearly everything they write is full of negativity, fear, hatred, fear-mongering, dooming, negative or doomsday type predictions, war-mongering, anger, rage, (covertly or overtly expressed) disappointment, and other made-up depressing shit.
In other words, if reading a post or comment makes you feel unnecessarily sad, mad, depressed, anxious, scared, panicky, hopeless, or even helpless --- congratulations, you've spotted a well blended in SHILL.
Because you see, it's not that difficult at all to pretend to be one of us. But when push comes to shove, these ones' masks come off.
So the next time you encounter absolutely any of them, ask them the following questions. And then, enjoy the free flow of salt as they struggle and squirm to answer even as much as a single question satisfactorily. For these ones are no different than your average household cockroaches or lizards, for their darkness-party ENDS the very MOMENT you turn on the LIGHT. So go switch on that light, by asking them to answer why:
QUESTION ONE: If the dark ones are truly winning, how come they STILL haven't been able to start off their dream project known as World War 3? It's been well over an entire month since that whole Ukraine madness started. You'd think someone truly powerful would've got that shit started full power by now.
QUESTION TWO: Where even are the dreaded 5G rollouts that were (well more than) supposed to be here by now? Forget globally, they haven't even been able to get that shit working locally. Doesn't look all that much like "winning" to me!
QUESTION THREE: If they were indeed that much powerful, how in the actual fuck is the Hunter Biden laptop story now mainstream instead of being hidden for good?
QUESTION FOUR: Why IS the entire world still not masked up, locked down, fully vaxxed, and thoroughly under NWO governance even after, what's it been like, 2 whole years of the whole plandemic restriction-setting and propagandas?
QUESTION FIVE: How in the world is Joe Rogan STILL walking around freely, still having a 20 million listener podcast and all, and STILL NOT cancelled by the "powerful" and "winning" commie elite?
QUESTION SIX: How the fuck were they even unable to prevent some random Tweeter from leaking the Ukraine Biolabs story? And beyond even that, how in the actual fuck did that story even become Actually. Fucking. MAINSTREAM??
"All powerful" and "winning" elite? Pfft, gimme a FUCKING break.
QUESTION SEVEN: If the elite were actually winning, why the fuck would some of the very BIGGEST paedo celebs out there upon our planet just, well --- Start. Utterly. Vanishing? And I'm not even SAYING THAT, folks --- ELON Motherfucking MUSK is.
Also, speaking of Mr. Musk, isn't it rather surprising just how much hate he's been getting on here, lately? And for what, dropping redpill bombs all over the place? Isn't that supposed to be a good thing regardless of what side he's even on? Even stranger, is that he's still getting hate even after buying that stake in Twitter. Which is super fucking surprising to me because, why the FUCK would the Black Hats have Elon buy Twitter (assuming he's working for them here), when @Jack has already been doing a supremely stellar job at the whole mass censorship and dissent-culling routine? Doesn't the very idea contradict itself? I mean, the guy banned Donald J Trump for fucksake; why would he even need a "better" replacement? Unless of course, Twitter is not just 9.2% under White Hat control, but instead, a whole ONE HUNDRED PERCENT by now.
Now, I'm not necessarily saying here that Elon Musk is a confirmed White Hat or anything, but, if he's a Black Hat, then, all of that LOGIC simply DOES NOT ADD UP. Besides, all of the liberals and commies and all of their news outlets have been busy tearing him down 24x7x366 --- and for many, many, months now. When was the last time those ones were up to any good? And, beyond even that, when was the last time people on here were in agreement with these mainstream agenda-pusher ones? So Elon Musk getting hate ON HERE for, quite literally, RED-PILLING THE ENTIRE FUCKING PLANET simply DOES NOT add up or compute for me. And neither does the idea of people on here so perfectly agreeing with the MSM and Liberal narratives --- so I must then suspect that great shilling is afoot.
Now I know for a fact that some people on here will then bring up Neuralink, which is perfectly a valid counterpoint to this all. But then hey, you know what, even Trump pushed for vaccines openly. You gonna hold him up to the exact same standards now? Or is that move then recognized as just an "act?" Pick ONE. Fucking. CHOICE.
In conclusion, BEWARE OF THOSE who are only and ONLY here to DISCOURAGE and DISSUADE you from being fully awakened and spreading the word about it. Also, BEWARE OF THOSE who are way too much in agreement with a mainstream point of view on things, and especially so when the said viewpoint is just highly, HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE (to say the very least!) Not telling you to either trust or not trust either Trump or Musk or absolutely whoever else, but be very, VERY wary of those who look all too keen on pushing a narrative, and those who use deflection, deception, and other illogical shit to push you towards doom and gloom. Because the Great Awakening is very much so ALIVE AND ACTIVE, and, dare I even say THRIVING (to say the very least!)
NO SHILL CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING.
NONE WHOSOEVER.
Enjoy the show.
WWG1WGA
While I appreciate your arguments, and you make some good ones, your categorization of dissenters into controlled opposition, and not just people with different opinions only drives division.
If someone makes an argument, whether or not you feel it is a "doomer" or "shill" argument, the argument either stands up to debate or it doesn't. To suggest that such arguments are intentional disinfo is really harmful to the debate process and the search for truth. In addition, it has a high chance of being wrong; people are people, and each one has different thoughts and opinions.
I like your arguments against many of the doomish thoughts. I like your assessment of the Elon situation, etc. I think worrying about "who's a doomer", and "who's a shill" is a terrible way to think about things.
The argument is the argument is the argument. The evidence is the evidence is the evidence. Ad hominem attacks, and categorizations as "the enemy" only get in the way of appreciating those statements, they never serve to add to the search for Truth.
Listen to what people say. Make your arguments against if you have them. Don't call them "the enemy" because they believe differently than you, even if it is vehemently opposed. Such action is the primary control mechanism of The Matrix.
Thank you for this comment. I love this place and hope for the best but I don't believe in devolution at all, so I hope I'm not seen as a shill for expressing my opinion on that.
OP's OP, in addition to being obnoxiously full of stylized text, inadvertently promotes hivemind behavior.
OP has a bit of a habit of jumping the gun and strong assertion. That is not to say his posts don't have merit a good chunk of the time.
However, as a returning visitor of the boards I'd like to say welcome, anon. I think this is a perfectly valid place for civilized and intellectual discussion.
There have been demonstrable attempts by the media and un-intelligence agencies to divide and smear this board, but that doesn't mean we should crucify people who have doubts or are skeptical.
I believe the devolution theory to the point, but even I have my doubts and my subtle disbelief. After all, while the bread crumbs are there and we can make some good arguments, we certainly are not walking on golden-paved streets in a land free of the medical tyranny of big pharma yet. It's hard to see the light of truth in such a murky, foggy tunnel we live in now.
But I also believe in the higher power of God - and that is what more or less all that keeps me going at times. Much as one might fear and hate the powers of the Invisible Enemy, they are not the only power in this world. And I fear and love that higher power infinitely more than I fear the enemy, even if I should face death for love of my Lord.
That is something they cannot take away - and something I trust far more than Trump or Q or anyone else.
But I am also a seeker of truth and someone who wants to see humanity survive this crisis. I felt whispered in my heart once that mankind would see a new era and that we would indeed spread to the stars. The old world - the crumbling, decrepit den of decadence and decay under the powers the cabal would be swept aside - though not by the hand of man. That is a future I want to see. Even my username is taken from a Shadowrun character - a cynical Elven knight who would fight for humanity's survival from the shadows; not for a particularly altruistic reason or love of mankind, but because someone has to and he knows that he can.
Thus, I will be critical of Trump. I will criticize devolution, even if I do believe that it is a correct theory. Because to believe in an ideal necessitates willingness to betray it - to consider that it may be false to search out its flaws so that one may improve or find even greater foundation if those ideals prove true.
As of writing, I am in a day of doubt, but I think most of it comes from my general lack of trust in human nature and peoples' willingness to act or speak when it is inconvenient for them to do so. And if they do so, I don't trust them to do so intelligently.
But to counter my own doubts, perhaps this is a fact that will bring a smile to your face as it did mine. If you are familiar with Amazon's attempt to rape Lord of the Rings with their new Netflix show.. the downvotes on that video reached 1.8 million before Youtube censored said downvotes and comments. However, as of writing this, the people made their voices heard by returning and downvoting again - this time they have exceeded 3 million downvotes. It may seem like a little thing, but this is just an inkling - a reminder that we are not alone, even if it does not seem like it often times.
Yeah I recognize the username and feel like he is probably usually on point. And is even right about there being some shills here who try to discourage us as a whole (though not as many lately, from what I can tell).
Other than those few, I think any and all distrust in the plan should be considered healthy at this point, though. As you alluded to, no one deserves our blind trust other than God. And truth be told, sometimes I feel like He needs our help more than we can rely on Him to just swoop in and make everything better.
Yeah well, three weeks ago OP also claimed ThE SToRM iS hErE!!!1!
Go take a look at OP's post history & be in awe. I liken it to diarrhea-in-style. Don't know what to make of it..
Uhhh, this forum is a hivemind. I think you meant echo-chamber. And yes, a healthy hivemind has rigorous dissent and argument throughout.
I like to go with the current way words are used, and for hivemind that would be the definition that says it's a group of people who conform to one way of thinking and abandon all individual accountability. And I like to think of anons as prescribing to the Q methodology of doing our own research, thinking for ourselves, etc.
In other words and sounds:
Uhhhhhh, no it's not.
I guess I might be wrong. It looks like an old plebbit term Iโm used to. Check out the third definition here. Obviously by the vote count, most people do not agree on the plebbit definition. My bad.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Hivemind
Stop the presses. Some one other than me doesn't buy into Devolution? How did you manage to get 5 upvotes?
Make no mistake, comrade: the de-devolution sect is secretly in control of this forum. We are merely letting the absence of devolution play out to the masses of this board because it's not enough to tell them: sometimes we have to show them. Once they realize devolution either failed or was never a strongly viable possibility, we will show ourselves.
Also, welcome aboard.
Well I'm going to put on a fresh brew of Colombian Supremo coffee and try to decode what you just said friend. De-Devolution? Is that of or not of that opinion? I have Commander in Chief as President Trump and Q team that comprises of six departments and the Military is engaged as we speak.
The one weird trick to reinstate your favorite president
"De-devolutionists HATE him!" hahaha.
No but that's a great comparison. It's the written (typed/tapped) version of Billy Mays yelling at you to buy a world-changing vegetable dicer.
I vehemently oppose globalists and pedophiles and I'm not afraid to call them my enemy. Anything less is tolerating, thus enabling them. I don't know about The Matrix, but this "CoExIsT" mentality is the control mechanism of the communist agenda.
The reason that communism sells is because it takes elements that make sense, and twists it, or leaves out important parts. The best lies are based on the truth. If you think everything about Communism is bad, you are falling directly into their trap. For example, there is a lot of merit in coexisting. Coexisting, and appreciating others is exactly what "all men are created equal" means. It is exactly what "love your neighbor" means.
When "coexisting" is taken, twisted, and forced, it causes cognitive dissonance, social disruption, and becomes a tool for... well... taking over the world.
The point of my post is that there is a distinction between who a person is, and the arguments they make. You can hate anyone you want (I mean, of course you can, its your choice, but I mean in the scope of this discussion it changes nothing). This is not about liking someone, or liking their agenda, or thinking they are doing good things, etc. This is about understanding the distinction between a person and what they say, the points/arguments they make.
We have been trained to apply ad hominem attacks to arguments so we can ignore the arguments themselves. This is the opposite of what it takes to get to the truth of a thing. I'm not suggesting you have to listen to everyone, but if someone is having a discussion about what someone says, the only way to take part in the conversation in an meaningful and additive (i.e. not subtractive) way is to address the argument. Addressing the presenter themselves in no way is a logical response to the argument. It creates disruption on the debate path, and the search for truth. Ad hominem attacks are always harmful to the process of investigation and truth.
Sorry fren, I believe you may be falling into theirs.
Definition of communism: the belief in a society without different social classes in which the methods of production are owned and controlled by all its members and everyone works as much as they can and receives what they need.
Sounds like nationwide slavery to me. But hey, I'm sure some percentage of people benefit from it.
I understand the point you're trying to make about discussions and arguments. What I'm trying to understand is when you deem it acceptable to call someone who ideologically opposes you and your way of life, for example pedophiles, an enemy? Is it ever acceptable?
I suggest you probably didn't understand what I was saying. In no way did I promote Communism. On the contrary, I basically stated it was evil and its only intent was to create a world wide totalitarian regime of soul destruction (though in this case I used fewer words).
What I said was it used good ideas to do its evil. You can't sell evil using evil, you must paint it as good. It must contain good within it or it can't sell.
Your definition of it, while not untrue, is not complete either. There are many elements to the communist agenda that are not stated in your definition. It was one of those elements not included that I was talking about, so I'm not sure why you stated it as you did. it really bypassed the point entirely.
I'm really not sure how this has anything to do with what I was saying. However, for me, someone is my enemy when they are trying to hurt me or someone else I am protecting. They are NOT my enemy at any other time.
I think there are people that are evil even when they are not my enemy. For example, if someone goes to prison, or is executed, or is otherwise incapable of harming me or anyone else they cease to be my enemy, but I still think they are evil. They must be a threat to be my enemy.
A person can't threaten me with an argument. They can't threaten me with "doom" or "shill" behavior. They thus can't be my enemy by typing words on a message board. In addition, just because someone espouses something I think is evil (shill) or thinks the sky is falling (doomer) doesn't make them an acting agent of evil. Sometimes they are to be sure, but very often they are just people, trying to exercise their demons.
A forum is like a home. Not everyone is allowed to come into your home. That is not a Right that people have. It is not about "free speech" it's about invitation to a personal space. We don't have the Right to invade someone's personal space.
This discrimination does not extend to public forums though. Within the public forum, if someone wants to talk about Drag Racing or Toenail Clippings they have the absolute Right to do so. That is Freedom of Speech, because it is not a private venue. There is no invitation required. All are invited, because the conversation is about the Social Contract which applies to all. This is exactly what the filibuster is.
Freedom of speech, only exists within the sphere of places for which there is no invitation required to join, or if it is a public space, for which there is no agent contractually bound to manage it. (Social Contract, not city/state contract. This is the difference between a Constitution and "laws").
The distinction here is "space" and "invitation." In the case of the private forum, or the public forum under contractual invitation, there is a space that is being violated by behavior that is not a part of the invitation.
However, any acts of discrimination are a very tricky subject. In the case of a topical forum, I would suggest that asking someone to stay on topic is the best first step. If that does not occur, ignoring someone is likely the best second step. Banning should be an absolute last resort imo. Those are my personal views, because I have seen what can happen in a free forum to change a persons mind with patience and understanding, but that is not about the Rights. No one has the Right to come into your home and talk about Drag Racing; because it's your home.
If there is no contractual bounds on speech within a public forum, then removal for any speech is a violation which must be dealt with in another way such as debate. If all else fails, an end to the meeting may be the only way. It can reconvene in a private venue where "free speech" does not apply.
Of course in a private venue, no votes can be had, no laws can be made, etc. So it's tricky, but I suggest it leads to far less fuckery than any other path.
And here's the thing. No they aren't. They are the opposite of off topic. They are exactly the topics we need to engage in. If we debate these topics, the results of those debates teach us how to form excellent debate responses to the exact same topics that come up in the outside world. There is nothing better than engaging in such debates to bring about the GA. This board's primary purpose is about the GA. The primary path to the GA is through debate of these topics. Silencing these topics keeps us weak, and unprepared for our main purpose (or at least my main purpose, one I believe I share with many others) which is to help others transition into a better world. To keep them alive and safe during this war for our minds.
You can't counter the brainwashing in others unless you practice countering that brainwashing.
Beyond that, such topics are reasonable. This is a disinformation war. There is no way to win such a war if we can't talk about anything related. The topics you are listing are undeniably related, they just may not be in agreement with Q, or your interpretation of Q.
Should such people really be silenced? Or should they be debated? Silencing keeps us weak, and helps no one. The strength of the mind is increased through debate, not censorship. Silencing dissenting views is a victory condition for the Cabal. It is the worst thing we can possibly do here.
If someone wants to talk about Drag Racing or Toenail Clippings, the door is over there, but if they want to talk about how Q is a psyop, or whatever they want to talk about that relates to the GA, or the war on The Minds of Men, then they absolutely should do so on this forum. We are well equipped to handle the debate. That debate will provide evidence for all to use in the war outside.
Every time I have ever spoken about moderation (which is not THIS topic, so I'm not sure where this is coming from, but whatever) I have said explicitly that AI is not allowed. "Moderation as a last resort" does not extend to banning AI. Obviously computers have no Rights posting on a Human board.
I suggest that debate is the strongest path out of such behavior, but I recognize that it is not always reasonable to adhere to that path in the strictest sense. I suggest it as a guiding principle, not an absolute. This is about invitation, not 1A.
The problem that I was addressing in my OP in this particular thread was one of categorizing people as "shills", "doomers", etc. THAT drives division. Most "shill" or "doomer" posts are actually just people, not hired thugs or AIs. When we categorize them, and silence them, we harm them, and we harm the community.
The community is based on research and debate. Shunning or silencing such people, who are just trying to talk about their thoughts as they relate to the war is the opposite of what we need to do to win it. The GA is about unification (We The People) and freedom of thought / life. Silencing people because they dissent is the opposite of the GA, and thus should be the opposite of the GA.win.
Thank you. We are not a hive-mind. And the Elon brain microchip issue warrants very real concern. Not to mention the manโs wife or father. There was reason behind Trumpโs advocation of a vaccine he didnโt create, pharma did. Thereโs no justification/reason behind brain-implanted microchips.
How about a blind man being able to see again? Or a veteran being able to walk again? Just because you've done no research doesn't mean the reasons don't exist.
If the technology can achieve these things, and is implemented by good guys and not bad guys then it would be an excellent tool. Like any tool, it depends on how it's used. A vaccine that isn't poison and actually prevents you from getting a dangerous sickness would also be great. It all depends on the implementation.