Beware the Watch the Water documentary. Jordan Sather weighs in.
(media.greatawakening.win)
📺 MEDIA PANIC
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (229)
sorted by:
So in genesis it talks about the "sons of men" taking wives from the "daughters of men". Many have theorized that this is satan's fallen angels taking wives and having children with them, the "nephelim". The fallen Angel's would therefore have DNA of some kind.
I'm not saying any of this is absolute truth, just sharing the knowledge that I have acquired to add to the understanding of the people or sources that would say things similar.
Blessings fren.
That was a Jewish belief and got some traction in church history, but its 100% reading into the text what's not there. It's actually the weakest of 3 major views on who the "sons of God" were (not sons of men).
Yet, it's in the KJV Genesis Chapter 6, specifically verses 1-7.
The Bible has many conundrums, missing books, it's a compilation with missing chapters, which may have shed some light - but, IMHO, understanding these issues are just "bonus points", as our salvation is not based on a comprehensive test on the Bible, but rather in our faith in Christ.
If I am wrong, that's on me.
I totally agree. I like researching Nephilim and Biblical topics like it because I crave to have a deeper understanding of the Bible, but one does not need to know that stuff to be saved. You just have to believe that God loved you so much that he sent his son Jesus to die on the cross for your sins.
Awesome guys! Spot on.
@hodar & gwgh83
There are many things in the bible that I understand completely, and have not yet implemented perfectly. Like love your enemies. I'm not too worried about the stuff I dont, but I do enjoy the mental exercise of looking into any of Gods word, and I pray the Holy Spirit would illuminate the text for me. Maybe some day.
Blessings.
@smartbaum you are correct "sons of God" my fault. The dangers of texting on lunch break.
I havent heard any stronger arguments as to who they were, but I haven't exhaustively studied the subject either.
Thank you again for the correction.
Blessings.
You are correct friend and your interpretation spot on. 1 Peter 3:18-20 specifically describes Jesus’ first act after resurrection to visit those fallen angels from Gen 6 that cohabitated with human women and had children by them.
You are right. Stay with your gut - there are those trying to lead you astray on this thread. Reread Gen 6 and the immediate following story of Noah and the flood. The read 1 Peter 3:18-20 which sums it all up for you. May God bless you friend!
If anyone wants to check this podcast out, it is very informative. Most of what he says is unsure to me. He has put some things together for me. It is very interesting at least to consider. I havent found it to be blasphemous.
I enjoyed it.
Blessings frens, God wins.