Beware the Watch the Water documentary. Jordan Sather weighs in.
(media.greatawakening.win)
📺 MEDIA PANIC
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (229)
sorted by:
No one said the "blood" of snakes is used.
the whole 'theory' is like a game of Telephone or the Whisper Game, where each person who repeats the message [potentially] distorts the meaning.
That's usually the sign of a shitty / poorly argued message. I felt underwhelmed by the docu, the guy was giving off a Mr. Burns vibe toward the end, strangely upbeat about ostensibly terrifying news. The spooky music didn't really help.
That's just Dr. Ardis's personality. He's light-hearted and likes to joke around. I've watched videos of Dr. Ardis speaking out against the numerous amount of vaccine injections when babies are born, and about the dangers of Remdesivir from like 4 months ago.
I trust Dr. Zelenko, who developed the Zelenko protocol which probably saved countless lives from covid or "venon" poisoning. Zelenko is the one who has revealed that they are on big pharma's hit-list.
Worth noting that nobody, afaik, has successfully synthesised snake venom. So where did the (millions of gallons of) venom come from? And how did they pump it into the water? And why wasn't it degraded by the chlorine (and fluoride)?
Also, how did [they] sneak the venom onto our Mediterranean island, whose coastline is continually monitored because of the huge American naval base here?
Askin for a fren'.
Don't throw the baby out with the venom water. I think people need to forget about the delivery theory because he doesn't know, he just suspected water for 2 very weak reasons anyway. But continue to focus on the venom evidence. A year ago my sister working in a hospital during one of the actual deadly outbreaks (most cases have just been flu but a few rare cases have definitely been something suspicious) called me telling me something was wrong with their blood. They were all young patients and their blood looked like it had been exposed to snake venom. She literally said this to me last year and the posts I made about it are still here and searchable. I for one think we should continue down the venom trail. Forget about the water for now.
Here, this might make you feel better. https://greatawakening.win/p/15HbS5Ahkf/wow-new-v
duper's delight probably.
Exactly. Or that we are being given Satan’s DNA.
I wonder about Jordan.
Satan doesn't have DNA....He's a spirit...he is not physical.
... a spirit
... often working 1st in our heads, that we 2nd misuse our minds, eyes and tongues and then 3rd acting out with our hands, legs and the whole body.
Read literally the first book of the Bible
The rest of the bible's teaching on angels contradicts your poor interpretation of Gen 6.
No biblical support elsewhere that angels, fallen demons or otherwise, can have sexual relations with humans. Jesus suggest otherwise when he teaches about angels not having any ability to enter marriage (which implies inability to procreate)
Secondly, demons (fallen angels) are never called "sons of God" ever in the bible.
Thirdly, God's anger in Gen 6 is towards humans, not demons. Wouldn't have God sent a spiritual form of "flood" to judge the demons first since they would have initiated the evil in the earth?
The only reason this demon-seed view is popular is because it captures the human imagination so easily
So in genesis it talks about the "sons of men" taking wives from the "daughters of men". Many have theorized that this is satan's fallen angels taking wives and having children with them, the "nephelim". The fallen Angel's would therefore have DNA of some kind.
I'm not saying any of this is absolute truth, just sharing the knowledge that I have acquired to add to the understanding of the people or sources that would say things similar.
Blessings fren.
That was a Jewish belief and got some traction in church history, but its 100% reading into the text what's not there. It's actually the weakest of 3 major views on who the "sons of God" were (not sons of men).
You are correct friend and your interpretation spot on. 1 Peter 3:18-20 specifically describes Jesus’ first act after resurrection to visit those fallen angels from Gen 6 that cohabitated with human women and had children by them.
You are right. Stay with your gut - there are those trying to lead you astray on this thread. Reread Gen 6 and the immediate following story of Noah and the flood. The read 1 Peter 3:18-20 which sums it all up for you. May God bless you friend!
He's not physical?! Why do people who don't know what the Bible has to say comment about things covered in the Bible?
Isaiah 14:16 talking about Lucifer: They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms;
Ya, where is the Jordan in this post?
Precisely! Which is why this interview became a 100% more realistic than when I listened to it, and it was 100% logical then!