Is it correct still that the only evidence of what is referred to as SARS - COV2 is the insilco genome sequence that was uploaded to the Chinese database on the 10th Jan 2020 as far as you are aware?
the only evidence of what is referred to as SARS - COV2 is the insilco genome sequence that was uploaded to the Chinese database on the 10th Jan 2020 as far as you are aware?
Well, there are numerous reports of isolation and sequencing that have come from various institutions around the world, so no, I don't think that's true at all. That was just the first such "isolation", which the CDC used for its recommendations, treatments, tests, etc.
Having said that, anything is possible, but it would require fraudulent activity on the part of all the people putting out those independent reports of sequencing, and that makes no sense to me. I have been in that world. That is just not something that would happen. It would have to be intentional, and that to me makes it "impossible."
Excellent, thanks for the reply.
Is it correct still that the only evidence of what is referred to as SARS - COV2 is the insilco genome sequence that was uploaded to the Chinese database on the 10th Jan 2020 as far as you are aware?
TIA.
Well, there are numerous reports of isolation and sequencing that have come from various institutions around the world, so no, I don't think that's true at all. That was just the first such "isolation", which the CDC used for its recommendations, treatments, tests, etc.
Having said that, anything is possible, but it would require fraudulent activity on the part of all the people putting out those independent reports of sequencing, and that makes no sense to me. I have been in that world. That is just not something that would happen. It would have to be intentional, and that to me makes it "impossible."
Again thanks for your insight it's very helpful.