No, you trust what men wrote on paper claiming to impart universal truth to you.
The biggest conspiracy is the fact that you take it as truth. Your bible was written, organized and pieced together like every other book on the planet. The Cabal knew what they were doing by manufacturing a religion that appeared really kind and compassionate.
Billions fell for it but it's still not the truth.
I've contemplated this idea for a very long time. If the cabal purposefully altered and manipulated all other history books as well as all documentation outlining our concept of reality, why wouldn't they also have done it with the Bible?
And for a while I even grew a bit paranoid at the idea that the Bible may have been purposefully altered in order to get us believers to inadvertently worship Satan instead of God. The idea of that was terrifying.
But after much reflection and many weeks of thinking about this, I was comforted by the realization that if that were the case, the cabal wouldn't have spent so much time and energy trying to invert the teachings of the Bible and to convince the population that its teachings were outdated, radical and obsolete.
They wouldn't be doing things like asserting that "Gender affirming care", is the morally sound way to care for one's children and seeking to make it a mainstream idea.
They are seeking to make the confusion and rejection of one's God given nature a widespread idea. They want children to be castrated in the name of inclusiveness and open mindedness.
And there are countless examples of these morally corrupt leaders taking the clearly defined, fundamentalist teachings of the Bible and inverting them on themselves in the name of righteousness.
So now I'm convinced that because God gave us the free will to choose between good and evil, he had to ensure the core teachings of the Bible withstood the test of time and remained untainted by Satanic intervention.
Anywho even when the bibles teachings are taken on an individual basis, there are ideas expressed that inherently resonate with me as pure, truthful and perfect.
Such as the idea of when giving to others, one should avoid being hypocritical and "let not your right hand know what your left hand is doing", something along those lines was described in the book of Matthew.
It essentially states that when you give to others, you should do so from the goodness of your heart and not in hopes of receiving something in return or for some ulterior motive. Such a teaching like that just strikes me to be objectively morally pure.
Which is something impossible to assess in any quantifiable way other than it just "makes sense" to not do good deeds for the sake of any external motives and instead do them out of genuine caring about relieving suffering from the person you are giving to.
I think that because it's impossible to prove that this is morally sound other than it inherently feels true within me and also aligns exactly with how Jesus behaved in the New Testament, that this must be a hallmark that the teaching is pure and true.
I think that morality is often objective and it's not a coincidence that even atheists have an inherent sense of morality that tends to line up with many teachings from the Bible.
Ugh!
That six pointed Star of Satan that Luke warned us about in Acts 7:43 gives me shivers every time I see it.
Sorry no, I don't recognize Satan's symbol as a beautiful flower.
I'll trust in Jesus Christ, thank you very much.
satan was named the "prince of the power of the air" for a reason.
Your words mean nothing when measured against the divine truth of the Gospel.
No, you trust what men wrote on paper claiming to impart universal truth to you.
The biggest conspiracy is the fact that you take it as truth. Your bible was written, organized and pieced together like every other book on the planet. The Cabal knew what they were doing by manufacturing a religion that appeared really kind and compassionate.
Billions fell for it but it's still not the truth.
I trust in Jesus Christ, my Heavenly Father and the Holy Ghost... no matter how much you protest or scream and cry.
Name one other book that prophesies all of history, before it was written, the way the Bible does.
I've contemplated this idea for a very long time. If the cabal purposefully altered and manipulated all other history books as well as all documentation outlining our concept of reality, why wouldn't they also have done it with the Bible?
And for a while I even grew a bit paranoid at the idea that the Bible may have been purposefully altered in order to get us believers to inadvertently worship Satan instead of God. The idea of that was terrifying.
But after much reflection and many weeks of thinking about this, I was comforted by the realization that if that were the case, the cabal wouldn't have spent so much time and energy trying to invert the teachings of the Bible and to convince the population that its teachings were outdated, radical and obsolete.
They wouldn't be doing things like asserting that "Gender affirming care", is the morally sound way to care for one's children and seeking to make it a mainstream idea.
They are seeking to make the confusion and rejection of one's God given nature a widespread idea. They want children to be castrated in the name of inclusiveness and open mindedness.
And there are countless examples of these morally corrupt leaders taking the clearly defined, fundamentalist teachings of the Bible and inverting them on themselves in the name of righteousness.
So now I'm convinced that because God gave us the free will to choose between good and evil, he had to ensure the core teachings of the Bible withstood the test of time and remained untainted by Satanic intervention.
Anywho even when the bibles teachings are taken on an individual basis, there are ideas expressed that inherently resonate with me as pure, truthful and perfect.
Such as the idea of when giving to others, one should avoid being hypocritical and "let not your right hand know what your left hand is doing", something along those lines was described in the book of Matthew.
It essentially states that when you give to others, you should do so from the goodness of your heart and not in hopes of receiving something in return or for some ulterior motive. Such a teaching like that just strikes me to be objectively morally pure.
Which is something impossible to assess in any quantifiable way other than it just "makes sense" to not do good deeds for the sake of any external motives and instead do them out of genuine caring about relieving suffering from the person you are giving to.
I think that because it's impossible to prove that this is morally sound other than it inherently feels true within me and also aligns exactly with how Jesus behaved in the New Testament, that this must be a hallmark that the teaching is pure and true.
I think that morality is often objective and it's not a coincidence that even atheists have an inherent sense of morality that tends to line up with many teachings from the Bible.
Just my two cents.
Honor Satan or don't.
It's your choice.