No, you trust what men wrote on paper claiming to impart universal truth to you.
The biggest conspiracy is the fact that you take it as truth. Your bible was written, organized and pieced together like every other book on the planet. The Cabal knew what they were doing by manufacturing a religion that appeared really kind and compassionate.
Billions fell for it but it's still not the truth.
The bible doesn't prophesy all of history. They're so ambiguous; don't name names or specific locations so all the adherents use confirmation bias to "prove" them correct.
They're so loosely written they could fit many things. The fact that you believe it simply exposes your dismal standards of "proof."
Check out the prophecies about the City of Tyre, and what happened historically there, ending with Alexander the great IIRC. 500 years ahead of time and it's very specific. But I guess the Cabal was just playing 500D chess all those centuries ago.
I've contemplated this idea for a very long time. If the cabal purposefully altered and manipulated all other history books as well as all documentation outlining our concept of reality, why wouldn't they also have done it with the Bible?
And for a while I even grew a bit paranoid at the idea that the Bible may have been purposefully altered in order to get us believers to inadvertently worship Satan instead of God. The idea of that was terrifying.
But after much reflection and many weeks of thinking about this, I was comforted by the realization that if that were the case, the cabal wouldn't have spent so much time and energy trying to invert the teachings of the Bible and to convince the population that its teachings were outdated, radical and obsolete.
They wouldn't be doing things like asserting that "Gender affirming care", is the morally sound way to care for one's children and seeking to make it a mainstream idea.
They are seeking to make the confusion and rejection of one's God given nature a widespread idea. They want children to be castrated in the name of inclusiveness and open mindedness.
And there are countless examples of these morally corrupt leaders taking the clearly defined, fundamentalist teachings of the Bible and inverting them on themselves in the name of righteousness.
So now I'm convinced that because God gave us the free will to choose between good and evil, he had to ensure the core teachings of the Bible withstood the test of time and remained untainted by Satanic intervention.
Anywho even when the bibles teachings are taken on an individual basis, there are ideas expressed that inherently resonate with me as pure, truthful and perfect.
Such as the idea of when giving to others, one should avoid being hypocritical and "let not your right hand know what your left hand is doing", something along those lines was described in the book of Matthew.
It essentially states that when you give to others, you should do so from the goodness of your heart and not in hopes of receiving something in return or for some ulterior motive. Such a teaching like that just strikes me to be objectively morally pure.
Which is something impossible to assess in any quantifiable way other than it just "makes sense" to not do good deeds for the sake of any external motives and instead do them out of genuine caring about relieving suffering from the person you are giving to.
I think that because it's impossible to prove that this is morally sound other than it inherently feels true within me and also aligns exactly with how Jesus behaved in the New Testament, that this must be a hallmark that the teaching is pure and true.
I think that morality is often objective and it's not a coincidence that even atheists have an inherent sense of morality that tends to line up with many teachings from the Bible.
Great comment. Research the Dead Sea Scrolls, and you'll see that the books of the Bible still match up with those ancient source documents, proving that somehow after 2000+ years, the Bible is still the Bible.
Obviously do your own research, but yeah, it's a real mind blower.
On a side note, if you've researched Q, then you may have come to the same conclusion as I did - that the cabal really solidified its control over the whole world just after World War 2, with the creation of the UN, the restoration of Israel, the Bretton Woods agreement, etc.
I find it fascinating that God revealed the Dead Sea Scrolls in 1947, just when the satanists had gotten control of the Earth, and were planning a huge push to get rid of Christianity. Almost as if God saw what was coming, and wanted us to know for certain that the Bible we were reading was what He had inspired 2000 years earlier.
It's manufactured hate of the ideology. The attacking of it, legitimizes it to the adherents.
This isn't complicated, man.
Speaking of castration... Doesn't your book have genital mutilation issues with regards to circumcision?
I appreciate your comment but the love and kindness you believe your religion is responsible for, has been around long before a book was written in an attempt to patent good, decent human behavior like Christianity has a monopoly on it. Kindness is a human trait, not a Christian one. We're not cursed and we're not inherently bad as your book implies.
I recommend looking into the Council of Nicea if you haven't already.
Lol you're right, it isn't complicated. Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father, except through me".
So I will strive to be like Jesus, and I will constantly come up short, but I will seek to emulate him in this life.
Also, I'm not a Christian fundamentalist, I just see alot of value in the Bibles teachings. There is no religion in the Bible after all. Religion developed AFTER the Bible.
I don't think the Bible claims circumcision has anything to do with righteousness. I always thought that was a Jewish concept that was thrown into Christian doctrine at some point, but I personally think it is unnatural to circumcise and that all the benefits described aren't based in fact. (Your penis doesn't spontaneously become infected if you're uncircumcised. And I believe sex feels even better than if uncircumcised. Of course I have no means of comparison, it just feels like it flows better to have that skin there)
Anywho, I'm sure some version of love and kindness existed before biblical times, but a foundation of morality rooted in being able to choose between self gratification and love, and choosing love, did not.
Religion forms the backbone of morality for a civilized society. I think its just as important for the possibility of technological development as agriculture itself.
I see value in its teachings as well. Doesn't make it gospel.
I understand your perspective but disagree. I personally feel religion is a net negative (Christianity is a religion). It offers some good things but at too much cost. Truth is, we don't need ancient books of suspect origins to show us. Just live in kindness each day and you'll see it's the best way to live, no religion necessary.
No, you trust what men wrote on paper claiming to impart universal truth to you.
The biggest conspiracy is the fact that you take it as truth. Your bible was written, organized and pieced together like every other book on the planet. The Cabal knew what they were doing by manufacturing a religion that appeared really kind and compassionate.
Billions fell for it but it's still not the truth.
I trust in Jesus Christ, my Heavenly Father and the Holy Ghost... no matter how much you protest or scream and cry.
Enjoy your mind cage.
LOL! An atheist calling Christianity a "mind cage"... that's rich.
I'm not an atheist.
I will pray for you.
Name one other book that prophesies all of history, before it was written, the way the Bible does.
The bible doesn't prophesy all of history. They're so ambiguous; don't name names or specific locations so all the adherents use confirmation bias to "prove" them correct.
They're so loosely written they could fit many things. The fact that you believe it simply exposes your dismal standards of "proof."
Check out the prophecies about the City of Tyre, and what happened historically there, ending with Alexander the great IIRC. 500 years ahead of time and it's very specific. But I guess the Cabal was just playing 500D chess all those centuries ago.
The sulfur balls littering Sodom and Gomorrah, the burnt top of Mount Sinai, the destroyed Babylon that has never been rebuilt, and there's a lot more
I've contemplated this idea for a very long time. If the cabal purposefully altered and manipulated all other history books as well as all documentation outlining our concept of reality, why wouldn't they also have done it with the Bible?
And for a while I even grew a bit paranoid at the idea that the Bible may have been purposefully altered in order to get us believers to inadvertently worship Satan instead of God. The idea of that was terrifying.
But after much reflection and many weeks of thinking about this, I was comforted by the realization that if that were the case, the cabal wouldn't have spent so much time and energy trying to invert the teachings of the Bible and to convince the population that its teachings were outdated, radical and obsolete.
They wouldn't be doing things like asserting that "Gender affirming care", is the morally sound way to care for one's children and seeking to make it a mainstream idea.
They are seeking to make the confusion and rejection of one's God given nature a widespread idea. They want children to be castrated in the name of inclusiveness and open mindedness.
And there are countless examples of these morally corrupt leaders taking the clearly defined, fundamentalist teachings of the Bible and inverting them on themselves in the name of righteousness.
So now I'm convinced that because God gave us the free will to choose between good and evil, he had to ensure the core teachings of the Bible withstood the test of time and remained untainted by Satanic intervention.
Anywho even when the bibles teachings are taken on an individual basis, there are ideas expressed that inherently resonate with me as pure, truthful and perfect.
Such as the idea of when giving to others, one should avoid being hypocritical and "let not your right hand know what your left hand is doing", something along those lines was described in the book of Matthew.
It essentially states that when you give to others, you should do so from the goodness of your heart and not in hopes of receiving something in return or for some ulterior motive. Such a teaching like that just strikes me to be objectively morally pure.
Which is something impossible to assess in any quantifiable way other than it just "makes sense" to not do good deeds for the sake of any external motives and instead do them out of genuine caring about relieving suffering from the person you are giving to.
I think that because it's impossible to prove that this is morally sound other than it inherently feels true within me and also aligns exactly with how Jesus behaved in the New Testament, that this must be a hallmark that the teaching is pure and true.
I think that morality is often objective and it's not a coincidence that even atheists have an inherent sense of morality that tends to line up with many teachings from the Bible.
Just my two cents.
Great comment. Research the Dead Sea Scrolls, and you'll see that the books of the Bible still match up with those ancient source documents, proving that somehow after 2000+ years, the Bible is still the Bible.
That's fascinating if true. I've heard of the dead sea scrolls but never looked into them.
Obviously do your own research, but yeah, it's a real mind blower.
On a side note, if you've researched Q, then you may have come to the same conclusion as I did - that the cabal really solidified its control over the whole world just after World War 2, with the creation of the UN, the restoration of Israel, the Bretton Woods agreement, etc.
I find it fascinating that God revealed the Dead Sea Scrolls in 1947, just when the satanists had gotten control of the Earth, and were planning a huge push to get rid of Christianity. Almost as if God saw what was coming, and wanted us to know for certain that the Bible we were reading was what He had inspired 2000 years earlier.
It's manufactured hate of the ideology. The attacking of it, legitimizes it to the adherents.
This isn't complicated, man.
Speaking of castration... Doesn't your book have genital mutilation issues with regards to circumcision?
I appreciate your comment but the love and kindness you believe your religion is responsible for, has been around long before a book was written in an attempt to patent good, decent human behavior like Christianity has a monopoly on it. Kindness is a human trait, not a Christian one. We're not cursed and we're not inherently bad as your book implies.
I recommend looking into the Council of Nicea if you haven't already.
Lol you're right, it isn't complicated. Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father, except through me".
So I will strive to be like Jesus, and I will constantly come up short, but I will seek to emulate him in this life.
Also, I'm not a Christian fundamentalist, I just see alot of value in the Bibles teachings. There is no religion in the Bible after all. Religion developed AFTER the Bible.
I don't think the Bible claims circumcision has anything to do with righteousness. I always thought that was a Jewish concept that was thrown into Christian doctrine at some point, but I personally think it is unnatural to circumcise and that all the benefits described aren't based in fact. (Your penis doesn't spontaneously become infected if you're uncircumcised. And I believe sex feels even better than if uncircumcised. Of course I have no means of comparison, it just feels like it flows better to have that skin there)
Anywho, I'm sure some version of love and kindness existed before biblical times, but a foundation of morality rooted in being able to choose between self gratification and love, and choosing love, did not.
Religion forms the backbone of morality for a civilized society. I think its just as important for the possibility of technological development as agriculture itself.
I see value in its teachings as well. Doesn't make it gospel.
I understand your perspective but disagree. I personally feel religion is a net negative (Christianity is a religion). It offers some good things but at too much cost. Truth is, we don't need ancient books of suspect origins to show us. Just live in kindness each day and you'll see it's the best way to live, no religion necessary.