Is the problem that they're boomers, or that they're corrupt?
Would you enjoy their corruption more had their parents engaged in unprotected sexual intercourse resulting in pregnancy a number of years later?
Qeq
BTW I use this same reasoning with liberals who bleat and whine that the ONLY reason people hate Foebama is because he's "black".
No, I wouldn't enjoy the corruption and outright treason of a violent racist foreign-born globalist criminal coming here with all his college and health records "sealed" (whatever the fuck THAT'S about) and usurping the presidency any more had he been white.
I lean towards boomers, honestly, they've ruled against the left too many times, even though they've ruled for them a time or two as well. Bias and all.
If this is true, wouldn't banning people constitute a violation of the first admendment?
yeah, but you'd need enough evidence to prove it to at leave five of nine Boomers who might not even take the case...
Is the problem that they're boomers, or that they're corrupt?
Would you enjoy their corruption more had their parents engaged in unprotected sexual intercourse resulting in pregnancy a number of years later?
Qeq
BTW I use this same reasoning with liberals who bleat and whine that the ONLY reason people hate Foebama is because he's "black".
No, I wouldn't enjoy the corruption and outright treason of a violent racist foreign-born globalist criminal coming here with all his college and health records "sealed" (whatever the fuck THAT'S about) and usurping the presidency any more had he been white.
I lean towards boomers, honestly, they've ruled against the left too many times, even though they've ruled for them a time or two as well. Bias and all.