What claims has he made that have panned out so poorly that imply he is a larp? I binged a few of his latest talks/interviews and it's not very different from clif_high with the "Khazar alien bug/demons are rogue AI" angle, so I'm kinda wondering what he's done in the past to draw ire from so many.
Other than him plugging his book and the endless "Two More Weeks™" rhetoric, what has he said that sent up huge red flags for you?
In a lot of comments, whenever his name comes up, I see a load of negative comments about him, but I have yet to see a single substantiated reason for the negativity. Just a lot of bad-mouthing and not much else.
You can check my history, I've not brought Savin up in any regard at all thus far, so just know I'm coming from a sincere place of ignorance as to why he is considered to be a larp/grifter.
Lately, it's been clear to me that Simon Parkes and Charlie Ward are either being duped by the bad actors, are intentionally scamming, or the White Hats have curiously turned them into Wimp Los to keep the Black Hats scratching their heads. I still watch their updates, because I listen to everything I can anyways, but I never have nor ever will throw as much as a dime their way, so rest assured I'm not in their camp.
Is Savin just like them, or a different breed?
What are your thoughts?
All his "ramblings" always have a point. Whether the point is valid or not is a different question, but the way he makes those points is by providing full context through what you call "ramblings".
I don't have time to focus on spreading actual happenings and exposures, and also sift through that. I have had some enjoyable times listening to him back when he was chatting with Roseanne Barr about the Bible, but I'm gonna stand on my take that he is ultimately a time-wasting grifter. IMO