Why do you believe that? The bible doesn't say, God spoke and said, "Let the big bang happen." And if the big bang happened (I don't believe it did) then why do the planets spin in different directions? They should all be spinning in the same direction.
No scientific theory on the origins of the universe says the universe came from nothing. That is public school lay persons explanation. Nothing isn't testable or observable.
Nah, I don't buy it. Just because a scientist says something, there's no reason to believe it's correct. Just like with anything else, scientists can be wrong, and they can also be bought and paid for. We've seen plenty of that. Why would you believe anything outside of what the bible teaches? And it certainly doesn't teach a very lengthy evolution where we go from a sea creature on to various stages of ape and then human. Not even close. And you didn't answer my question.
Because the Bible has many contradictions and people have left them out and added them as they see fit. In modern times people selectively agree with what they agree with. I am not looking at all the minute scientific details, just using the term Big Bang because God created it all, the hundreds of millions of galaxies. Not looking to debate this now, God is expecting us to step up and stop Satan.
Why do you say people have left things out and added them? Are you not aware that the original texts of the bible were confirmed by the Dead Sea Scrolls and that the translation / text was consistent with modern day translations? Anyway, I don't know what you're looking for by asking your question. It seems you find it hard to believe what you believe.
I remember watching a show a long while back I think a scientist who explained things from a creation point of view. Anyways he posited a theory one may reconcile the observed age of the universe with the roughly 6000 years from Bible by looking at from time dilation created by relativity. From an observer (let’s say God) on the edge of the expanding universe expanding near speed of light, time would be really slow and be days while to observer on earth it would appear to be millions and billions of years having gone by.
Can science, as a body of knowledge arrived at by hypothesis-> test-> same result, be wrong?
Yes. It has been shown to be. E=mc² is wrong. See magnet. Kepler was wrong too. albeit initially. Why? He was taken by his own musings on the beauty of mathematics. This subjection of himself to this body of knowledge, was such that it blinded him from the facts. He even concluded that his facts were wrong, just to conserve his ideas. Yet, later he discovered that, instead of circular, the movement of planets was elliptical. He was humble enough to question his own bias, which, by the way, was deeply rooted in his view of God. By discovering his bias and the rigorous test (decades I should say) he rewrote his hypothesis, and started testing it.
A 1000 years ago, a Persian scientist, mused about the proliferation of plants and their environments. He deduced that environmental factors caused changes in plants producing different species. Those factors were the availability of water and the timing of them, the soil type, the temperature and climate. But since his religion proscribed: everything is as Allah wills it, the solution was quite obvious. Allah did it. Was he right? People believed for ages that it was so.
Only Darwin and Wallis took it one step further and proved that these factors, these environmental factors, which none of us have in hand, caused selection, in the sense that those life forms with the most appropriate faculties to that environment have a better chance of reproduction and hence proliferation.
Think oranges. Can you grow oranges in Idaho? I guess, but you then would have to append the environment. A green-house might help. With that you provide the exact environment for oranges to grow.
This same process is done by humans where it concerns dogs, vegetables, grains, life-stock, etc.
Just the fact that science, as a body of knowledge based on experiments is wrong, does not mean it is wrong. It is our human way of knowing the universe. Observation and questioning. That is the start. To be able to penetrate mysteries, we have to device new instruments to be able measure things. Hence the iso-codes.
However, and this bears repeating. The belief the science of the last three years, has been demonstrably a false narrative and hardly indicative of what science is.
Goto min: 25:00. That is the pendulum experiment. The pendulum science predicts certain outcomes. Levin puts it to the test. And guess what? the prediction is true. And Levin dared to put his health on the line to demonstrate it.
When an object is spinning in a closed system and no external torques are applied to it, it will have no change in angular momentum.
The conservation of angular momentum explains the angular acceleration of an ice skater as she brings her arms and legs close to the vertical axis of rotation.
If the net torque is zero, then angular momentum is constant or conserved.
Where does the same direction come in?
With an explosion it can be observed you contention is not factual. Objects spin in all kinds of directions and with different direction of spin away from the source of the explosion.
Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn are all visible with the naked eye. The word "planet" means wanderer and they were named so because their position is constantly changing relative to other stars. I'm not concluding that they are whole other worlds, but what are they?
Why do you believe that? The bible doesn't say, God spoke and said, "Let the big bang happen." And if the big bang happened (I don't believe it did) then why do the planets spin in different directions? They should all be spinning in the same direction.
If the Big Bang theory is legit, then what started that? It wasn't nothingness that started a bang... This one sometimes makes an Atheist think
No scientific theory on the origins of the universe says the universe came from nothing. That is public school lay persons explanation. Nothing isn't testable or observable.
Spoke into the darkness and created... God invented the science we live in, I think eventually we will understand.
Nah, I don't buy it. Just because a scientist says something, there's no reason to believe it's correct. Just like with anything else, scientists can be wrong, and they can also be bought and paid for. We've seen plenty of that. Why would you believe anything outside of what the bible teaches? And it certainly doesn't teach a very lengthy evolution where we go from a sea creature on to various stages of ape and then human. Not even close. And you didn't answer my question.
Because the Bible has many contradictions and people have left them out and added them as they see fit. In modern times people selectively agree with what they agree with. I am not looking at all the minute scientific details, just using the term Big Bang because God created it all, the hundreds of millions of galaxies. Not looking to debate this now, God is expecting us to step up and stop Satan.
Why do you say people have left things out and added them? Are you not aware that the original texts of the bible were confirmed by the Dead Sea Scrolls and that the translation / text was consistent with modern day translations? Anyway, I don't know what you're looking for by asking your question. It seems you find it hard to believe what you believe.
I remember watching a show a long while back I think a scientist who explained things from a creation point of view. Anyways he posited a theory one may reconcile the observed age of the universe with the roughly 6000 years from Bible by looking at from time dilation created by relativity. From an observer (let’s say God) on the edge of the expanding universe expanding near speed of light, time would be really slow and be days while to observer on earth it would appear to be millions and billions of years having gone by.
Can science, as a body of knowledge arrived at by hypothesis-> test-> same result, be wrong?
Yes. It has been shown to be. E=mc² is wrong. See magnet. Kepler was wrong too. albeit initially. Why? He was taken by his own musings on the beauty of mathematics. This subjection of himself to this body of knowledge, was such that it blinded him from the facts. He even concluded that his facts were wrong, just to conserve his ideas. Yet, later he discovered that, instead of circular, the movement of planets was elliptical. He was humble enough to question his own bias, which, by the way, was deeply rooted in his view of God. By discovering his bias and the rigorous test (decades I should say) he rewrote his hypothesis, and started testing it.
A 1000 years ago, a Persian scientist, mused about the proliferation of plants and their environments. He deduced that environmental factors caused changes in plants producing different species. Those factors were the availability of water and the timing of them, the soil type, the temperature and climate. But since his religion proscribed: everything is as Allah wills it, the solution was quite obvious. Allah did it. Was he right? People believed for ages that it was so.
Only Darwin and Wallis took it one step further and proved that these factors, these environmental factors, which none of us have in hand, caused selection, in the sense that those life forms with the most appropriate faculties to that environment have a better chance of reproduction and hence proliferation.
Think oranges. Can you grow oranges in Idaho? I guess, but you then would have to append the environment. A green-house might help. With that you provide the exact environment for oranges to grow.
This same process is done by humans where it concerns dogs, vegetables, grains, life-stock, etc.
Just the fact that science, as a body of knowledge based on experiments is wrong, does not mean it is wrong. It is our human way of knowing the universe. Observation and questioning. That is the start. To be able to penetrate mysteries, we have to device new instruments to be able measure things. Hence the iso-codes.
However, and this bears repeating. The belief the science of the last three years, has been demonstrably a false narrative and hardly indicative of what science is.
You want to see a : belief the science event?
https://yewtu.be/watch?v=sJG-rXBbmCc
Goto min: 25:00. That is the pendulum experiment. The pendulum science predicts certain outcomes. Levin puts it to the test. And guess what? the prediction is true. And Levin dared to put his health on the line to demonstrate it.
why should the planets spin in same direction if the Big Bang is real?
Because of a law in physics called The Conservation of Angular Momentum.
Where does the same direction come in?
With an explosion it can be observed you contention is not factual. Objects spin in all kinds of directions and with different direction of spin away from the source of the explosion.
There are no planets
Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn are all visible with the naked eye. The word "planet" means wanderer and they were named so because their position is constantly changing relative to other stars. I'm not concluding that they are whole other worlds, but what are they?