.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
.
Not necessarily performance based, it's just that said performance is a very good measure of capacity.
Let's call it performance based then, also known as meritocracy, you're against it?
IDk, it doesn't exist yet
How about a constantly rotating panel of (actual) experts? you can only serve for a couple of years in that position, then can only serve again after 10 years, would perhaps prevent bias and corruption
Whatever it is it must be contemplated, you can't avoid doing something out of fear of mistakes and obstacles, it must happen
Or do you really think people who:
Should be allowed to help decide the fate of a nation?
Maybe just really go back to the land-owner thing, it has it's set-backs, because one can just inherit land.... but at least it would be something.