So in conspiracy cases, hearsay is allowed? Inquiring minds want verification :D
edit: Didn't spell out anything about conspiracy that I saw (granted I read over it quickly like I did for high school homework for highlights that gave fast a fast A/A- on tests & homework... predictible programmed educators LOL) so I could have missed a detail that didn't pop.
This particular picture is hard to read, but the previous motion was introducing Hillary's tweets as evidence of conspiracy - however the prosecution was not planning to prove that her tweets were correct (in which case it would be heresay) but rather they already knew it was wrong, but the tweets were intended to show that they were co-ordinating.
The defence had filed objection, so I am assuming this one is the reply related to this.
So in conspiracy cases, hearsay is allowed? Inquiring minds want verification :D
edit: Didn't spell out anything about conspiracy that I saw (granted I read over it quickly like I did for high school homework for highlights that gave fast a fast A/A- on tests & homework... predictible programmed educators LOL) so I could have missed a detail that didn't pop.
https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics
This particular picture is hard to read, but the previous motion was introducing Hillary's tweets as evidence of conspiracy - however the prosecution was not planning to prove that her tweets were correct (in which case it would be heresay) but rather they already knew it was wrong, but the tweets were intended to show that they were co-ordinating.
The defence had filed objection, so I am assuming this one is the reply related to this.
Thanks for the insight. If we aren't staying on top of it all, it can be easy to miss the direction things are going.
I really am enjoying this show :D