Does one of those cases supercede the unilateral aspect of POTUS decision for martial law? Because that's my understanding. Btw, your comment was very well informed, it seemed, I'm just looking for the primary source as I always do.
Specific aspects are reinforced from the various precedents mentioned in these cases, where the SCOTUS was clarifying things like "Previously this was applied to a natural disaster, but it applies to a rebellion as well".
However, when Q asked about the precedents that gave the president the ability to deploy the national guard and to declare martial law, they were referring to these precedents. This is the deepest reason behind J6 happening the way it did, and why this movie is playing out like it is. Edit: Also, when they said it must all be done legally.
Patriots Are Now In Control, and in ways we cannot predict but only translate afterwards.
Does one of those cases supercede the unilateral aspect of POTUS decision for martial law? Because that's my understanding. Btw, your comment was very well informed, it seemed, I'm just looking for the primary source as I always do.
Specific aspects are reinforced from the various precedents mentioned in these cases, where the SCOTUS was clarifying things like "Previously this was applied to a natural disaster, but it applies to a rebellion as well".
However, when Q asked about the precedents that gave the president the ability to deploy the national guard and to declare martial law, they were referring to these precedents. This is the deepest reason behind J6 happening the way it did, and why this movie is playing out like it is. Edit: Also, when they said it must all be done legally.
Patriots Are Now In Control, and in ways we cannot predict but only translate afterwards.