No. You just have an inability to fit all cases within your paradigm. Good for execution. All you have to do is get that changed in the states that forbid it. Not so good for persons who commit crimes that cannot be rectified by restitution (e.g., accidental death by malfeasance, massive embezzlement, tortuous fraud).
God gave authority to the Kings (at the foolish request of the Hebrews), and this led to both David, Solomon, and Ahab. We live in a human world with human imperfection. We need to do the best we can, but your model is not going to work for all cases.
I clearly said "execution" was an option. You chose to ignore that and attack a straw-man instead. You still haven't backtracked on that dishonest misrepresentation. Then you followed up with another about shooting everyone.
Then you make a huge category error by bringing up states without the death penalty. We're talking about an IDEAL system to move to. That means changing everything. Super simple stuff.
I didn't give an entire model obviously, I gave a brief summery obviously. This isn't a final proposal, it's a discussion. There are multiple books and experts on the subject that have gone WAY into the weeds on this stuff.
That's a straw-man. I never said that. You must have missed the part about execution.
Next time read the whole comment before you mouth breath a reply.
Shoot all vile persons? That's a solution?
The original idea of a penitentiary was to provide an opportunity for penance. I guess you are too impatient with that.
Do you have an inability to represent some ones position honestly or are you just dumb?
No. You just have an inability to fit all cases within your paradigm. Good for execution. All you have to do is get that changed in the states that forbid it. Not so good for persons who commit crimes that cannot be rectified by restitution (e.g., accidental death by malfeasance, massive embezzlement, tortuous fraud).
God gave authority to the Kings (at the foolish request of the Hebrews), and this led to both David, Solomon, and Ahab. We live in a human world with human imperfection. We need to do the best we can, but your model is not going to work for all cases.
Satisfied?
I clearly said "execution" was an option. You chose to ignore that and attack a straw-man instead. You still haven't backtracked on that dishonest misrepresentation. Then you followed up with another about shooting everyone.
Then you make a huge category error by bringing up states without the death penalty. We're talking about an IDEAL system to move to. That means changing everything. Super simple stuff.
I didn't give an entire model obviously, I gave a brief summery obviously. This isn't a final proposal, it's a discussion. There are multiple books and experts on the subject that have gone WAY into the weeds on this stuff.
Are you done? Doesn't matter, I am.