(Tracy Beanz) Sussmann is in deep trouble! (See top comment)
(media.greatawakening.win)
Durham Update
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (60)
sorted by:
None of those three people have ever prosecuted a single case much less an insanely complex RICO case involving the worlds most powerful psychopaths.
They have ZERO lawfare experience. On the other hand, Durhams playing at a top tier level with no do overs if he fukks up.
Prosecutors who have handled RICO cases and who ARE very dialed in to what Durham has and is up to are "peoples opinions I respect" around Durham. Examples? Kash Patel and Trumps DNI Ratcliffe. Also @Techno_Fog.
Non lawyer emotionals like Sundance and Beanz? Absolutely not. Margot Cleveland the lawyer academic? Not for analysis around a RICO case lawfare death match.
For war analysis I prefer hearing from successful warriors, especially warriors with insider info and a history or courageous honesty.
Sundance is an analytical doomer
Yep, my thoughts exactly.
Precisely.
He's a great resource for source material and links to original documents but I agree. If he is dismissing Q without any analysis at all - and he is and he does - I take what he says with a grain of salt. Unlike Cates or Patel Patriot, he doesn't simply say he's not interested in looking at it because he only wants publicly available info or whatever, he literally trashes people who think there might be something to the whole Q is a military operation thing. Any thinking person IMO who sets aside their pre-disposition cannot come away from the statistical improbabilities weighing in favor of Q being connected to the Trump administration and the people behind it. That was true two years ago. Now you have Nunes and Kash Patel and others on Truth Social openly promoting Q accounts, and General Flynn giving interviews with guys like Dave X22. Come on, man!