Author of Alice in Wonderland was a known pedophile.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (57)
sorted by:
I don’t necessarily disagree with your assertion about the moon, but your reasoning in this instance isn’t that great. There are still benefits from going to America, flying across the Atlantic, and launching satellites. There don’t seem to be as many benefits of going to the moon.
If we never went to the moon then we would be less familiar with the lack of benefits of going to the moon, and we would be more enticed to go there for the first time to see for ourselves. The fact that people haven’t been interested in going to the moon in about 50 years might indicate that they really did go there and confirmed it’s not worth going.
I’d guess that humans have been on the moon, as telescopes can see man-made items on its surface (unless you’re one of those ‘the-night-sky-is-fake’ types). The footage from Apollo 11 is fishy. The people who have theorized about a possible background matte painting that limits the distance of the rover might have a point. Also the low-g movement of people and the flag is sometimes strange. So maybe they went to the moon in the early 1970s but not in 1969. Or maybe they did make it there in 69 but didn’t like the footage, so they used some fake footage. I’m not sure.
I am a ('all telescopes powerful enough to see items on the Moon are fully controlled by Clowns' type).
/u/RugerP89
To interject in this discussion with my 2 cents, the symbols guy does make some rash judgement calls, in my opinion.
In all honesty, I think we were on the moon long, long before the moon landing supposedly took place.
The landing was, therefore, pantomime to establish comms.
With what? It's not so clear. The moon stands for so much in so many cultures, it may well be a declaration that JFK was really looking for a way to land on the subconscious mind (maybe to reverse MK Ultra brainwashing, which we learned how to do from the NAZIs?). I'm not convinced of that, so let's continue to assume they did go to the moon, but under illusory auspices.
The decodingsymbols guy also claims nuclear bombs don't exist either.
I think it's not all that simple.
Like every other symbol comm, for a Mirror to exist, the Real must exist as well, in some capacity. Think of it like a Mountain and a Still Pond. The Pond reflects the mountains, and you can obviously muddy the waters or add waves that distort, but you aren't affecting the Truth, in that the Mountain itself had not been shaken.
So, yes, I think we did land on the moon, but with technology FAR AND AWAY more advanced than they'd like for the public to know about. So, they created a fake moon landing to show the public we did go there, but made us think that strictly 60's era technology was capable of doing so.
What technology did they want to prevent us from knowing about? I'd wager it was Ether/Aether or some other form of propulsion-less craft that would clearly demonstrate the use of free-energy systems, a la Nikola Tesla's resonant frequency devices.
How does that sit with you two?
That true facts are perpetually unclear lends to the secrecy of the comms, and is why AI can never decode them -- it requires discerning human with first-hand knowledge of natural phenomena and relationships.
Immediately followed by:
It is testament to the brilliance of the illusion Clown World has instilled in us, that presuming secret black project tech is "less rash" than believing that swathes of Media and scientific fields coordinate to lie to us on a regular basis.
That being said...
DecodingSymbols delves heavily in Nuclear plants being fake, in that, a simple chemical reaction is what creates essentially free energy, not hazardous material needing to be encased in a foot of lead. I am surprised that decode doesn't resonate with you more.
Also, dont you imagine that the illusion of a "wrath of God world ender" type weapon (nuclear bomb) wouldn't have been a convenient lie for Globalists to keep in their pocket for controlling the masses?