https://unherd.com/thepost/is-crypto-just-one-big-ponzi-scheme/
This article ignores other potential benefits to crypto (that is, beyond a possible rise in price) and also ignores precious metals, which like crypto offer no interest payments or dividends but have other benefits. The article also ignores some of the possible RISKS of crypto (e.g., that the alleged security and privacy might be illusions, outright theft by an exchange, loss of a wallet or a password, etc). Metals also have risks (theft of physical metal for instance, including government confiscation, plus the added risk if one uses a third party to hold the metal).
There is nothing in life without risk; assessing risk and choosing which ones to take on are among the more important life skills.
Defining whether or not something is — or has become — a Ponzi scheme has been long forgotten; it involves working out if an investment’s underlying structure creates a negative-sum game. With regulated securities, such as stocks and bonds, investors receive a combination of interest payments, dividends, and cash flows, making these, at the very least, a zero-sum endeavour. With crypto, however, investors receive none of these, only benefiting from a potential rise in price — the so-called greater fool theory.
This disparity, among other things, has led many financial commentators to describe even the number one crypto, Bitcoin, as a negative-sum Ponzi scheme (one FT story suggested it was even ‘worse’ than that). If Bitcoin’s ecosystem collapses, funds can’t be returned to holders because its price going to zero means there’s nothing to recover. But with a Ponzi scheme, funds can be recovered and returned to investors. Following the collapse of the infamous Madoff Ponzi scheme, 14 out of 20 billion dollars initially invested have been recovered from offshore accounts.
For now, Bitcoin’s Ponzi status is irrelevant. Bankman-Fried has simply joined the increasing list of crypto’s nobility who’ve accidentally gloated about profiting from dubious financial structures. Mike Novogratz, CEO of Galaxy Investment Partners, infamously likened Bitcoin to a pyramid scheme, despite how his company’s primary function is cryptocurrency investments. Meanwhile, outlets in the crypto media have also embraced Ponzinomics, like CoinDesk publishing an article with a lede reading: “Yes, it’s a Ponzi scheme. But who cares?”
Just look at the replies in this thread. As usual the naysayers have no real arguments and are not able to analyze decentralized crypto in depth. They have no real understanding of this new and powerful technology.
Just the fact that the the ENTIRE financial industry blocked donations to Wikileaks years ago and Wikileaks was able to survive thanks to Bitcoin donations, should tell people how amazing Bitcoin is. It's decentralized and unstoppable. Big power players can only spread FUD to negatively affect Bitcoin. And still people believe this cRypTo is a PoNzi ScHemE nonsense.
Most of these people don't even understand that there's billions of people in the world that don't have access to banking services or that have limited access to banking services. This is why a large portion of the Kenyan economy is now run on the Mpesa CALLING MINUTE exchange system. People pay eachother with mobile payments by exchaning the calling minutes they have on their mobile phone plan.
It's very obvious to anyone who has done some research into crypto that it absolutely is here to stay and holds great promise. With crypto anyone in the world can have access to banking services on their phone. But some spoiled Westerners just keep yelling it's a ponzi....
Munger types
You guys get all worked up over "decentralized" and forget that 900 people own over half of all the bitcoin in existence. It might be the most centralized currency out there.
You get all worked up over safe and anonymous. It is neither. Every transaction is traced and recorded. Hacks for billions happen regularly. Basically when ever they want to.
And its digital. If the internet goes down your money doesnt exist. If the power goes down, your money doesnt exist.
Crypto is none of the things it was hailed and propped up for.
How many people own all the gold?
Every country owns a large portion. Its actually distributed pretty well among all civilized countries. Gold is the most decentralized of any form of currency.
What's this argument that if the power goes out, you lose your money? Where the hell did you hear that? The whole point of a decentralized blockchain is to preserve data forever, since you would have to delete every copy in existence and good luck doing that when there are tens of thousands of computers all over the world all simultaneously working to prevent it.
At most, you would temporarily lose connectivity, but your funds will always exist and be accessible as long as you have your private key.
Please stop with the power outage FUD.
How are you going to use your digital phony money when the power is out? Or when the internet is out? Or both?
Say the power is out for several days, youre in line for your ration of gas at the local gas station. Its your turn and you ask the attendant if they'll take an IOU on your digital money? You'll get laughed out of every store in existence.
Want to trade or barter for goods? Imagine trying to trade a bitcoin during a crisis for some food. Lmao, they'll tell you to beat it.
Why are acting like those conditions would be permanent? Do power outages happen? Of course!
So you can't use crypto in that situation. Use something else, like silver, as a backup for offline transactions. Crypto is better for digital purchases because that's what it was designed for. No one is saying to ditch metals for crypto, but to act like this is a reason not to use crypto at all is just retarded. And if you're worried about traceability look into Monero.
There is absolutely no reason to still be using banks for storing your wealth.