lol you are complaining when Q said himself the US and world will have to literally be on the brink of death. You are not there yet but you will be and its going pretty fast.
Is waiting until the brink of death generally a sound strategy? Do you hold off treating cancer until the last moment? Do you avoid swerving out of the way of something in your traffic lane until the absolute last minute?
Of course you don't, and why is that? Because if you wait until the last second you have one and only one action and if it doesn't work you're screwed because you have no time to formulate another response.
I'd challenge stray's interpretation that the world "will have to literally be on the brink of death". I guess one could argue that this is what the precipice means, but....
When I think about this situation, I reflect on a bunch of different factors in reaching my conclusions, including:
War. War is hard, tough, and people suffer. War is NOT about avoiding casualties as much as possible. Otherwise, surrender would always seem an option. War is about winning, even if it means sacrifice, death and suffering, because NOT winning the war would result in something far, far worse. (talking about righteous war here, between good and evil, nto war for the purpose of conquest).
Some pedes look around them and see the suffering, death and difficulties, and they start to imagine that it's actually unnecessary, or avoidable. In my view, they are ignoring the truth that this is a war. A war on which the entire future of the human race and world depends, at that.
Game theory. I think about how the military intelligence would have access to the absolute highest levels of computing power and game theory practitioners, etc. I imagine how they ran hundreds and thousands of scenarios, imagining, discussing, analyzing, applying game theory. I imagine that they did all that analysis and concluded: "we have to go this way. This is the best, least damaging way forward that has the best chance of winning."
I trust that they did the hard work, that they did the analysis. At some point, we have to trust our military, and those who stand in positions of responsibility. Not because they will never make mistakes, but because a) they carry a responsibility that we ourselves probably could never handle (because if we could, we would be in their position) and b) we have to trust God, and in doing so, trust them. Trust that God is guiding them.
History. Historically, for MOST of human history, there have been generations that suffered far, far worse than we are now suffering. Are people starving? People in the past have died from starving year after year. Are people freezing to death? Are people being shelled, and attacked, and shot at or invaded by marauders?
Historically, the suffering most of us are experiencing is very small by comparison, except only for this:
Perspective: the suffering most of us are experiencing is a psychological, emotional and spiritual suffering. THAT is the nature of suffering today. It's being duped, mislead, feeling that so much is at stake, and yet Evil is so great, etc.
So, we should not really deny that suffering is there. But we should be thankful that externally, it's nowhere near as bad as most generations that suffered previously. At the same time, we need to understand that because this is the final war between good and evil, the cross we must carry is an internal one, of the heart, of the spirit, and of the mind. But we should also understand that it's this way for an important reason. Would we prefer that our children, or our children's children suffer this, or we?
My problem is that the general power to dismiss any commissioned member of the armed services exists broadly with the President as Commander in Chief under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution and is specifically codified in 10 U.S.C. § 1161(a). Which means if the deep state decides they're not going to let some coverr military operation against them exist they just ensure we're in a declared war against anybody and have the President remove and replaced anybody not known to be loyal to the deep state.
You might recall Truman removed MacAurthur during the Korean War. So any military operation can be brought from a covert thing into the daylight by the President ordering removal of the "conspirators" and they either comply or openly defy and things get dragged into an open crisis. The deep state would have no reason to allow such an operation to exist in a military they ostensibly control through the Commander in Chief and Congress.
If devolution actually occurred, then the current Resident and his minions do NOT have the power to do what you stated : "the general power to dismiss any commissioned member of the armed services"
The concept of the Precipice here is that the broader framework is controlled. In other words, the puppets in 'the government' are restricted to what they can actually do. They can cause damage and inflict problems, but not to such an extent that it cannot be resolved or wound back.
Words by DJT support that view, as does the devolution analysis of Patel Patriot and others.
It would be nothing short of reckless and treason for DJT to simply walk away without safety catches and precautions in place. Everything about his behavior indicates he would never do that, too. (In my opinion)
So, yeah, the idea of just letting things run wild until everything is so bad and so disastrous with the 'hope' that at some point, the people would wake up and save the day, is not sensible really. But this is not how contingency and planning works. There is always the backup plan.
lol you are complaining when Q said himself the US and world will have to literally be on the brink of death. You are not there yet but you will be and its going pretty fast.
Is waiting until the brink of death generally a sound strategy? Do you hold off treating cancer until the last moment? Do you avoid swerving out of the way of something in your traffic lane until the absolute last minute?
Of course you don't, and why is that? Because if you wait until the last second you have one and only one action and if it doesn't work you're screwed because you have no time to formulate another response.
I'd challenge stray's interpretation that the world "will have to literally be on the brink of death". I guess one could argue that this is what the precipice means, but....
When I think about this situation, I reflect on a bunch of different factors in reaching my conclusions, including:
Some pedes look around them and see the suffering, death and difficulties, and they start to imagine that it's actually unnecessary, or avoidable. In my view, they are ignoring the truth that this is a war. A war on which the entire future of the human race and world depends, at that.
I trust that they did the hard work, that they did the analysis. At some point, we have to trust our military, and those who stand in positions of responsibility. Not because they will never make mistakes, but because a) they carry a responsibility that we ourselves probably could never handle (because if we could, we would be in their position) and b) we have to trust God, and in doing so, trust them. Trust that God is guiding them.
Historically, the suffering most of us are experiencing is very small by comparison, except only for this:
Perspective: the suffering most of us are experiencing is a psychological, emotional and spiritual suffering. THAT is the nature of suffering today. It's being duped, mislead, feeling that so much is at stake, and yet Evil is so great, etc.
So, we should not really deny that suffering is there. But we should be thankful that externally, it's nowhere near as bad as most generations that suffered previously. At the same time, we need to understand that because this is the final war between good and evil, the cross we must carry is an internal one, of the heart, of the spirit, and of the mind. But we should also understand that it's this way for an important reason. Would we prefer that our children, or our children's children suffer this, or we?
My problem is that the general power to dismiss any commissioned member of the armed services exists broadly with the President as Commander in Chief under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution and is specifically codified in 10 U.S.C. § 1161(a). Which means if the deep state decides they're not going to let some coverr military operation against them exist they just ensure we're in a declared war against anybody and have the President remove and replaced anybody not known to be loyal to the deep state.
You might recall Truman removed MacAurthur during the Korean War. So any military operation can be brought from a covert thing into the daylight by the President ordering removal of the "conspirators" and they either comply or openly defy and things get dragged into an open crisis. The deep state would have no reason to allow such an operation to exist in a military they ostensibly control through the Commander in Chief and Congress.
If devolution actually occurred, then the current Resident and his minions do NOT have the power to do what you stated : "the general power to dismiss any commissioned member of the armed services"
The concept of the Precipice here is that the broader framework is controlled. In other words, the puppets in 'the government' are restricted to what they can actually do. They can cause damage and inflict problems, but not to such an extent that it cannot be resolved or wound back.
Words by DJT support that view, as does the devolution analysis of Patel Patriot and others.
It would be nothing short of reckless and treason for DJT to simply walk away without safety catches and precautions in place. Everything about his behavior indicates he would never do that, too. (In my opinion)
So, yeah, the idea of just letting things run wild until everything is so bad and so disastrous with the 'hope' that at some point, the people would wake up and save the day, is not sensible really. But this is not how contingency and planning works. There is always the backup plan.
I wonder is this is really necessary