Israel for last. Make of this what you will.
(www.reuters.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Sorry deleted thinking irrelevant. This is not my area. Perhaps this helps, perhaps not.
https://files.catbox.moe/724f1g.jpg
As I mentioned elsewhere in this thread, I believe this claim is bogus for the following reasons:
Wealthy Jewish families, especially aristocrats, kept bloodlines...and inheritances..."in the family," so to speak. So, relationships were between cousins, et al. The historical claim, here, is that a Rothschild had an illicit affair with a maid, then, years later, tracked her down, and bestowed a massive fortune onto the child. Really?
If such an affair and a child occurred, the obvious reaction would be to deny it happened, so that there would NOT be any claim against the family fortune. There were no DNA tests, etc., and no other way to prove it even if it were true.
Adolph Hitler would have been the grandchild. Again, knowing how these families work, why would a Rothschild care to have influence over an illegitimate son...let alone a grandchild?
I don't know what the possible psyop could be behind this. I can't think of who might benefit from making such a claim. A little logic applied to questions such as this provides at least a helpful amount of perspective.
I too find it a stretch, but I have not put in the time on this topic. Thanks for the input.
Watch yourself, goyim!