As a female, I understand most women vote along what their feelings say. That’s not always the best choice. Personally I ask my husband for his view and direction as I fully trust his wisdom in such matters. I wouldn’t be offended if women couldn’t vote in the future due to the way we analyze things.
Mens stoicism provides an anchor to womens emotionalism. Womens emotionalism humanizes mens stoicism. Together they are the strength of humanity.
My wife and I always discuss every decision, including who we will vote for. We are a team. We are far more together than the sum of our parts. I never would have accomplished what I have without her.
My husband came into my life just shy of our 50th birthdays. So it was not until then that I could "indulge" in my emotional, vulnerable self.
Having been around overly emotional men most of my life, I developed a very stoic, logical approach. It has been a pure joy to be less pragmatic, less logical and more artistic.
Women are so adaptable that the conscientious ones will do what it takes to make things work, and the sociopathic ones will manipulate all who stand in their way using whatever tools society allows them.
You are very awake. Wow. Most women will not admit that they are more emotional than men. There's nothing wrong with it and it's the way God designed us. Yin and Yang.
For SURE my husband helps stabilize my emotions. The Good Lord knew exactly what He was doing when He linked us together through marriage, I’m not sure there’s another human male out there willing to deal with some of my irrational thoughts LOL 💀
My husband definitely keeps me “grounded” mentally (:
Well said. I don't want to oppress women by taking their vote away, BUT, if women want to vote for communism, then I wouldn't lose sleep over nixing their vote.
I agree. I don't think we can revoke the vote for women, but perhaps in the future a test demonstrating knowledge of our constitution or we could just rewind all the way back to landowners only. 1 vote per landowner tho. Bill and Zuckie would have less power in that system.
As a female, I understand most women vote along what their feelings say. That’s not always the best choice. Personally I ask my husband for his view and direction as I fully trust his wisdom in such matters. I wouldn’t be offended if women couldn’t vote in the future due to the way we analyze things.
Mens stoicism provides an anchor to womens emotionalism. Womens emotionalism humanizes mens stoicism. Together they are the strength of humanity.
My wife and I always discuss every decision, including who we will vote for. We are a team. We are far more together than the sum of our parts. I never would have accomplished what I have without her.
My husband came into my life just shy of our 50th birthdays. So it was not until then that I could "indulge" in my emotional, vulnerable self.
Having been around overly emotional men most of my life, I developed a very stoic, logical approach. It has been a pure joy to be less pragmatic, less logical and more artistic.
Women are so adaptable that the conscientious ones will do what it takes to make things work, and the sociopathic ones will manipulate all who stand in their way using whatever tools society allows them.
You are very awake. Wow. Most women will not admit that they are more emotional than men. There's nothing wrong with it and it's the way God designed us. Yin and Yang.
For SURE my husband helps stabilize my emotions. The Good Lord knew exactly what He was doing when He linked us together through marriage, I’m not sure there’s another human male out there willing to deal with some of my irrational thoughts LOL 💀
My husband definitely keeps me “grounded” mentally (:
Well said. I don't want to oppress women by taking their vote away, BUT, if women want to vote for communism, then I wouldn't lose sleep over nixing their vote.
As a woman, I wouldn't mind that at all. Most women due vote based on their emotions. Women are also easily taken in by sob stories. Most men aren't.
I agree. I don't think we can revoke the vote for women, but perhaps in the future a test demonstrating knowledge of our constitution or we could just rewind all the way back to landowners only. 1 vote per landowner tho. Bill and Zuckie would have less power in that system.