While this is a win at face value, is there some type of ulterior motive?? Was this done intentionally to enrage the left in an attempt to increase (mad) voter turn out? I personally think so
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (65)
sorted by:
Does anyone truly think that these newly "enraged Progressives" would have voted for conservative candidates if this SCOTUS "leak" had not occurred? Yeah, it might pick up a few more Prog votes, but I've never seen the Right so energized and angry....and dare I say it, ENRAGED.
And who was it that enraged us? The Progressives, that's who.
AND, on top of these progressive votes, how many disenchanted regular Dem voters will move out of their couch to vote for the same guy who made them lose their job and not afford gas or groceries, just because Muh Abortion ?
Most Dems got the vaccine so they didn’t really end up losing their jobs like we have. Also their latest virtue signal is that they are paying all this to avoid dependence on Russia.
The objective is to incite rage in hopes of increasing the turnout of the left base.
Oh yeah, I understand that, but will it work? There are large blocs of Progressives who simply don't show up on election day.... lots of young people, students, etc., many in the black community. We'll see... but what I'm saying is that I don't think Prog-Rage is going to be anywhere near as motivating as the rage we're feeling on the Right. For the first time in my life I'm ready to "take it to the streets" to see the end of the Prog threat to America. And I know I'm not alone.
You would be correct. I know many apolitical people that have conservative values who are ready to take to the streets. The energy is astounding.