Good Question!
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (5)
sorted by:
Well their answer would be gender is a social construct but sex is not, you're changing sex to affirm gender
That's their logic.
Nothing about actual gender traits is a social construct. The most we can dictate is whether pink is a feminine color or pink is a masculine color. Women can wear pants or women can't wear pants. Men can have long hair or can't have long hair.
Superficial, arbitrary crap is the only part of gender that is a social construct. And those views aren't shaped by logic or truth, but by your upbringing, religion, geographical area, etc
In short, just like skin color tribalism is retarded, arguing about sex and gender is pointless.
Well said.
But if you are changing sex to affirm gender, then you are buying into to social construct. Why wouldn't you simply not conform to the social construct? That would be easier and not self-destructive.
At a deeper level, I think it is the self-destructive part that is the true purpose. It is in the Satanic inversion of God's plan.
Just remind them who coined the term "gender."
They changed the names of the Cleveland Indians and Washington Redskins for less.
IMHO:
I always viewed the word sex and the word gender to be one in the same, 100% interchangeable. All of a sudden (within the past 10 years) they aren't the same.
They're redefining the meaning of words. This is straight out of Orwell's 1984 (newspeak). He who controls the language controls culture. Granted language evolves over time (bad means good, sick means cool) but that change is organic and slow. The evolution of the meaning of sex/gender was not natural; it was immediate and deliberate. Our enemy has infiltrated our institutions and is deliberately poisoning our minds with ideas meant to divide us. I would assess that our enemy's tactic is highly effective in causing division.