Wow, this is a steaming pile of unconvincing flailing. “Who do you believe, us, objective fact checkers for the Associated Press, or your lying eyes?”
The mules recorded dumping piles of ballots in the drop boxes could’ve just been doing it for (large) families, or the disabled! And many were wearing gloves (in Atlanta) because of the cold, and COVID. And then they threw their rubber gloves in the trash because it, I dunno, warmed up quickly. 🙄🙄🙄
Pages and pages of fatuous and false deboonking like this only makes this movie seem even more credible than it already did.
The cell phone data is the same that prosecutors use in court against We The People, but when we use it against [them] they say its not accurate enough. Kek
Well, the cell phone data is good for proving where someone was, not what they were doing there.
Proving that somebody was within a few feet of where they were standing is pretty good proof they were at Trump’s rally for a precise amount of time, and where they traveled in that rally.
Being in certain areas (like the Capitol) during the rally was a crime, so a location is good enough to prove a crime occurred.
Proving that someone walked near a drop box a few times, when those drop boxes are deliberately placed on highly-trafficked areas, doesn’t prove a crime, because it wasn’t illegal to walk through public areas more than once. The location isn’t illegal.
So location data in this case doesn’t really prove a crime, because cell phone data can’t prove someone was dropping off fake votes. That would have to be corroborated by additional evidence for that specific individual.
I'm glad you're here to debate this. It'd be best to watch the movie, which won't be a waste of time. It'll address many questions and arguments. It will also prove AP's phony fact check is absurd. If AP were honest, they would be asking if these same mules normally traveled to these dropbox locations before or after the election week window.
Well, the AP isn’t the one making the claim, so I’d say the burden of providing that proof would be on the documentary. If they want their numbers to be credible, then they need to be the ones closing in these gaps in the data. It’s not up to me or the AP to validate their claims for them.
I too am interested in the range that this data was collected. I’ll see if I can track down a written report on which this documentary was based.
Wow, this is a steaming pile of unconvincing flailing. “Who do you believe, us, objective fact checkers for the Associated Press, or your lying eyes?”
The mules recorded dumping piles of ballots in the drop boxes could’ve just been doing it for (large) families, or the disabled! And many were wearing gloves (in Atlanta) because of the cold, and COVID. And then they threw their rubber gloves in the trash because it, I dunno, warmed up quickly. 🙄🙄🙄
Pages and pages of fatuous and false deboonking like this only makes this movie seem even more credible than it already did.
The cell phone data is the same that prosecutors use in court against We The People, but when we use it against [them] they say its not accurate enough. Kek
Well, the cell phone data is good for proving where someone was, not what they were doing there.
Proving that somebody was within a few feet of where they were standing is pretty good proof they were at Trump’s rally for a precise amount of time, and where they traveled in that rally.
Being in certain areas (like the Capitol) during the rally was a crime, so a location is good enough to prove a crime occurred.
Proving that someone walked near a drop box a few times, when those drop boxes are deliberately placed on highly-trafficked areas, doesn’t prove a crime, because it wasn’t illegal to walk through public areas more than once. The location isn’t illegal.
So location data in this case doesn’t really prove a crime, because cell phone data can’t prove someone was dropping off fake votes. That would have to be corroborated by additional evidence for that specific individual.
I'm glad you're here to debate this. It'd be best to watch the movie, which won't be a waste of time. It'll address many questions and arguments. It will also prove AP's phony fact check is absurd. If AP were honest, they would be asking if these same mules normally traveled to these dropbox locations before or after the election week window.
Well, the AP isn’t the one making the claim, so I’d say the burden of providing that proof would be on the documentary. If they want their numbers to be credible, then they need to be the ones closing in these gaps in the data. It’s not up to me or the AP to validate their claims for them.
I too am interested in the range that this data was collected. I’ll see if I can track down a written report on which this documentary was based.