I am not sure about the correlation implied in your title. It could be that JJ was blocked because it is not mRNA, and it does not make money for the right people (Fauci and friends).
Did you? No citations to scientific data, just unsupported claims. "Trust us."
The FDA's intentions are totally trustworthy right? It's not like they attempted to convince a judge to give them until 2076 to fully release the phizer vaccines data, at 500 pages a month.
I agree that the J&J vaccine isn't safe either, but let's just be honest here..
They're simply eliminating the competition.
I have not seen a whole lot of evidence about the JJ vax causing ongoing clotting. There is a risk when you first get it. I am not downplaying that. My point is that if that risk is great enough to shut down that vax, then for sure the FDA would also shut down the other vaxes. So, why don't they?
You seem to be thinking that my point implied that there is nothing wrong with the JJ vax, and that is not what I said at all.
The point is, a risk is a risk is a risk. How many have died directly from the mRNA shots? More than 20K!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But the JJ is pulled out of circulation because of 9 deaths?
If the FDA is concerned about the effects of reported cases, then all of these covid vaccines should be blocked. That they’re specifically targeting the one that doesn’t use mRNA is telling.
Every one of the Covid shots, including a Pfizer and Moderna must be pulled because NONE of them have been proven to be safe, nor effective. Unfortunately the medical community does not know how to treat the effects of this EUA poison and in many cases refuses to admit or has been threatened to NOT admit the side effects were vaccine acquired. Remember: your body, your choice!
I knew someone personally that was once engaged to my best friend that died within a week of taking the Janssen jab due to aggressive clotting post-jab this past November. A former coworker of mine had two in-laws die within a couple of weeks of the other, and another coworker hallucinated after hitting temps of 107 after her first shot. I had been steadily warning them all that the shots were toxic. My spouse brought home the package insert from the first batch they received, and everything the ministry of health was floating was in direct contradiction with the manufacturer's package inserts. It blew my mind when Fauci pushed for pregnant women to get jabbed when even Pfizer themselves advised against it in their insert (likely because of their data that dropped the other day showing 1 out of 32 babies survived the trial). There's a special place in hell for them all.
I know of two deaths and three serious hospitalizations in my small circle of family and friends. None reported as vax injuries, but all heart or stroke related. Their numbers are severely under reported.
Ugh…almost everyone I know who took the shot is having serious health issues. From A-fib to cancer to heart attack and death.
I am not sure about the correlation implied in your title. It could be that JJ was blocked because it is not mRNA, and it does not make money for the right people (Fauci and friends).
Did you? No citations to scientific data, just unsupported claims. "Trust us."
The FDA's intentions are totally trustworthy right? It's not like they attempted to convince a judge to give them until 2076 to fully release the phizer vaccines data, at 500 pages a month.
I agree that the J&J vaccine isn't safe either, but let's just be honest here.. They're simply eliminating the competition.
I read the tweet. It makes a claim, but I dont trust the FDA.
I have not seen a whole lot of evidence about the JJ vax causing ongoing clotting. There is a risk when you first get it. I am not downplaying that. My point is that if that risk is great enough to shut down that vax, then for sure the FDA would also shut down the other vaxes. So, why don't they?
You seem to be thinking that my point implied that there is nothing wrong with the JJ vax, and that is not what I said at all.
Someone else just posted my point: https://greatawakening.win/p/15HuoNRJCg/fda-limiting-jj-due-to-blood-clo/c/
The point is, a risk is a risk is a risk. How many have died directly from the mRNA shots? More than 20K!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But the JJ is pulled out of circulation because of 9 deaths?
Where's the parity?
If the FDA is concerned about the effects of reported cases, then all of these covid vaccines should be blocked. That they’re specifically targeting the one that doesn’t use mRNA is telling.
Every one of the Covid shots, including a Pfizer and Moderna must be pulled because NONE of them have been proven to be safe, nor effective. Unfortunately the medical community does not know how to treat the effects of this EUA poison and in many cases refuses to admit or has been threatened to NOT admit the side effects were vaccine acquired. Remember: your body, your choice!
I knew someone personally that was once engaged to my best friend that died within a week of taking the Janssen jab due to aggressive clotting post-jab this past November. A former coworker of mine had two in-laws die within a couple of weeks of the other, and another coworker hallucinated after hitting temps of 107 after her first shot. I had been steadily warning them all that the shots were toxic. My spouse brought home the package insert from the first batch they received, and everything the ministry of health was floating was in direct contradiction with the manufacturer's package inserts. It blew my mind when Fauci pushed for pregnant women to get jabbed when even Pfizer themselves advised against it in their insert (likely because of their data that dropped the other day showing 1 out of 32 babies survived the trial). There's a special place in hell for them all.
I know of two deaths and three serious hospitalizations in my small circle of family and friends. None reported as vax injuries, but all heart or stroke related. Their numbers are severely under reported.
So... the jab isn't "safe and effective"?