A little tidbit I caught that Dinesh and the True the Vote people didn't fully explain, is that all those averaged numbers they were throwing out for the "swing states" didn't account for the daily trafficking. They made it VERY clear that the mules were taking these exact same routes EVERY SINGLE DAY. If I heard them correctly the data they bought only accounted for October 25th to November 3rd, so 25 days if my counting is correct.
So using quick math on the Atlanta Metro numbers 250 Mules x 24 Drop Boxes per route = 6,000 Daily Mule visits to the boxes. Assuming an average of 5 ballots per visit give's us 30,000 ballots a day. Now multiply that by 25 since this was a daily occurrence during that period, and that gives us 750,000 trafficked ballots in the Atlanta metro.
Keep in mind these numbers are entirely feasible since Metro Atlanta has a population of 6,144,050 people. So that's enough to put Georgia in the deep red state Territory (It would have Trump winning by a margin of 16-20% with a margin of error of 2%), but like the movie clearly stated, THIS ONLY ACCOUNTS FOR METRO ATLANTA. Apply this to Savanna and all the other "blue" areas of the state, heck, even the red parts probably.
And that's just Georgia. Apply this same logic to the other states and it get's much worse. And even then, it's only these 6 states that were looked at. We KNOW this crap is happening everywhere there's a city with a moderately large population or with the "right demographics". Nashville, Memphis, Austin, Miami, NYC, LA, Chicago, Portland, Seattle, Denver, Salt Lake City, Fairfax, Charlotte, Columbus, Tulsa, OKC, etc. etc.
Heck, you can probably safely say that this crap even happens in smaller cities that are "blue". Charleston WV, Boise, Billings, Jackson Hole, Knoxville, Chattanooga, Roanoke, Wilmington, Asheville, etc. etc. I say this, because even though the counties that a lot of these places are in are Red, they're banking on the cities growing and eventually becoming an Arizona/Georgia situation where they can overwhelm the rest of the state with a handful of corrupt cities where they've cheated their way into control and power.
I'm not saying there are NO liberals, but it's becoming more and more apparent and evident that there are so few of them in reality that the only way they can maintain any semblance of control is by cheating to such an absurd degree that it blows our collective mind that they got away with it for so long.
There are liberals, and they are a significant chunk of metro areas.
You're right about the strategy to dominate several key metropolitan areas to dominate state-level politics. This is also why they want to dismantle the electoral college. But, I still think metro areas would skew slightly blue (just not 60-70%).
Most people in cities are stupid and/or ill-informed and/or narcissistic and/or lack critical thinking skills.
Now, if the media coverage was more fair, and if we valued critical thinking as part of the education of our youth, this might be different. But as it stands there are just too many sheep (for lack of a better word) in metro areas to make them dark red.
Georgia, for example, is probably a ruby red state with slight blue Atlanta and Savannah.
See, I don't even believe that. Case in point, this post/article that shows that 79% of ballots in Atlanta/Fulton County were fake, illegal, etc.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15HbgCaicl/just-the-news-more-than-300000-v/
Realistically, you were probably right if this were several years ago. I still believed they cheated their way into power in such areas even back then though, given just because people may believe a certain way, doesn't mean they have the motivation to do anything about it. A LOT of these votes are probably the result of voting FOR people that are simply too lazy or sorry to vote themselves, but are still registered.
Think about college students. They tend to skew left, officially anyway, but at the same time, most of them don't actually vote. They just act stupid, party, get high, etc. Voting isn't high on their priority list. But you register them at registration rallies, and then that gives these mules and all of their organizers a larger pool of fake votes to pull from in order to cheat their people into power.
So realistically, you were probably right in what you're saying several years ago. Most metros probably DID have a "slight" blue tilt in terms of ideology, but the people actually voting were overwhelmingly red, so they had to cheat their lefty operatives into office. Now though, things have changed. More people have woke up, and more are waking up every day. So I'm pretty confident the opposite is true now, most metros are probably pink or light red in terms of political ideology and people are more active in their voting patterns, so they have to cheat MUCH harder to maintain control.
Another consideration is where the line between conservatives and liberals lies.
That line has moved quite a distance to the left over the past few decades, such that most JFK-era Dems would likely identify more closely with middle- to left-leaning conservatives than with middle- to right-leaning Democrats.
IF the voting public were well-informed about party platforms (especially the shift in the Dems' "official" ideology/platform to insane wokism and socialist/communist ideology) THAT, in and of itself, would increase the "redness" of an areas.
Unfortunately, TOO MANY people who ACTUALLY vote, vote for their party and it's candidates without truly assessing what that party, its candidates and their vote are supporting.
The problem is, they don't fucking vote. I refuse to believe these people actually got up and voted for Biden. His turnout was a joke, nobody knows him or what he stands for other than not be Trump. I know tons of Republicans who didn't vote for McCain in 2008, or Romney in 2012. The same can be said for Biden, or your average corrupt mayor in a blue city. But we'll simply never know until we have a nation-wide election system that's reliable.
I actually don't think you are wrong on this. Most people didnt vote. Or, probably, didn't know they voted by dropbox.
But still my point is that people in cities are generally low information idiots who trust government and/or media and are so self-absorbed they don't care anyway.
I think if you actually had 100% turnout in cities they would skew blue since most low info voters vote blue because the media pushes the surface level lie that they are the good people.
Yes, I imagine if there was compulsory voting, there would still be a bunch of blue cities still, but you'd see a lot more rogue candidates from the far Left like AoC or Bernie that resemble nothing of the current crop of mayors running these cities.