There's not even a point in trying to show people about EVs. I go to car forums and the cars subreddit and its a nightmare when you ask questions about or directly tell them where the materials come from, how they become radioactive in landfills, etc. It's nuts!
I get the same feeling reading comments on CarAndDriver articles. It's like they're all lefty blue state lunatics that absolutely loathe all history of the automobile.
And that really annoys me... I'm a car history and racing history nut, so when these "car guys" can't wait for all motor racing and road cars to be electric, I'm just astonished. You envy the days of Group C, Group B, GTP, turbo v12s in f1, but now you want to destroy the internal combustion engine?
It's sad. But at least EV batteries are a progression in technology. If we can push the technology further and develop new ways to store energy, that's good for the world in the long run and the private sector is the most likely place to find that.
On the other hand, wind turbines are demonstrably a net loss on the environment. There's not much that can be enhanced about them. You will always need strong and resistant materials that are actually light enough to be moved by wind.
But in the process of this technology, many birds die which will concentrate and spread disease, and it takes up a lot of real estate..and is set up in places that would be good for additional farming or housing.
At least with solar, it's expensive and inefficient and not 100% recyclable, but it's not directly and immediately killing the birds around it. And you can get a few panels and have a small amount of energy in case of a power outage.
Privately owned turbines? Hah. Good luck with the paper work, the clean up and the hard to use power.
Batteries are growing in technology by leaps and bounds. Lithium Carbonate, Lithium Peroxide, with Toyota coming out with their prototype of a solid state lithium based battery (think SOLID chunk of ceramic, with about 240% charge density of current tech) and Tesla announcing a Lithium - Sulphur Battery with a life cycle measured around 4 Million miles.
These newer technologies will likely give ~1,000 miles/charge. And the R&D is being done by CAPITALISM.
There are also some very new revolutionary changes coming in the mining industry - in how we GET these minerals. The way we got Gold in the 1800's is not the same way we get Gold today. The way we get Lithium, Manganese, Graphene, Cobalt and Nickel is going to change. Northern Nevada has enough Lithium trapped in the clay deposits to meet the US needs through the year 2050 - just in Nevada.
There is a reason why every single car manufacturer is moving to EV.
You are aware that Telsa sold approximately 349,000 EV's in the last quarter, right? That Tesla has so many backorders on the books - right now - that they may stop taking pre-orders, because the backorders are going out beyond a year.
Compare against GM, that sold 349 cars; after dealers marked the prices up $10,000 over sticker. You cannot even order a Ford Mustang EV this year.
Wind farms are a total failure. Maintenance costs are way too high.
Wait until people "find out" about EV batteries.
There's not even a point in trying to show people about EVs. I go to car forums and the cars subreddit and its a nightmare when you ask questions about or directly tell them where the materials come from, how they become radioactive in landfills, etc. It's nuts!
I get the same feeling reading comments on CarAndDriver articles. It's like they're all lefty blue state lunatics that absolutely loathe all history of the automobile.
And that really annoys me... I'm a car history and racing history nut, so when these "car guys" can't wait for all motor racing and road cars to be electric, I'm just astonished. You envy the days of Group C, Group B, GTP, turbo v12s in f1, but now you want to destroy the internal combustion engine?
It's sad. But at least EV batteries are a progression in technology. If we can push the technology further and develop new ways to store energy, that's good for the world in the long run and the private sector is the most likely place to find that.
On the other hand, wind turbines are demonstrably a net loss on the environment. There's not much that can be enhanced about them. You will always need strong and resistant materials that are actually light enough to be moved by wind.
But in the process of this technology, many birds die which will concentrate and spread disease, and it takes up a lot of real estate..and is set up in places that would be good for additional farming or housing.
At least with solar, it's expensive and inefficient and not 100% recyclable, but it's not directly and immediately killing the birds around it. And you can get a few panels and have a small amount of energy in case of a power outage.
Privately owned turbines? Hah. Good luck with the paper work, the clean up and the hard to use power.
Batteries are growing in technology by leaps and bounds. Lithium Carbonate, Lithium Peroxide, with Toyota coming out with their prototype of a solid state lithium based battery (think SOLID chunk of ceramic, with about 240% charge density of current tech) and Tesla announcing a Lithium - Sulphur Battery with a life cycle measured around 4 Million miles.
These newer technologies will likely give ~1,000 miles/charge. And the R&D is being done by CAPITALISM.
There are also some very new revolutionary changes coming in the mining industry - in how we GET these minerals. The way we got Gold in the 1800's is not the same way we get Gold today. The way we get Lithium, Manganese, Graphene, Cobalt and Nickel is going to change. Northern Nevada has enough Lithium trapped in the clay deposits to meet the US needs through the year 2050 - just in Nevada.
There is a reason why every single car manufacturer is moving to EV.
The problem with electric is that it's being pushed by the cabal, not the free market.
A little bit of column A, and a little bit of column B.
Clearly gas vs electric is being used as a wedge issue. They are creating demand.
Tesla, on the other hand, is pushing to improve the technology beyond everyone else, which is a function of the free market, to meet that demand.
You are aware that Telsa sold approximately 349,000 EV's in the last quarter, right? That Tesla has so many backorders on the books - right now - that they may stop taking pre-orders, because the backorders are going out beyond a year.
Compare against GM, that sold 349 cars; after dealers marked the prices up $10,000 over sticker. You cannot even order a Ford Mustang EV this year.
And they are ugly AF.