The whole spying on DNC just to dispose him sounds very convoluted, and there is bound to be more here. Is it possible Republicans decided to take him down?
I always envision CIA on the Bush side, and Rockefeller+Depop guys on the Clinton side. So maybe the CIA cabal faction took him down when they realised he was not their guy ?
They wanted to paint themselves as victims of the evil republicans who were "nazis" who resorted to illegal spying to stop the poor widdle hippy democrats who just cared about the environment and minority rights.
It's projection. They also want to portray conservatives as evil tyrants obsessed with them while they portray themselves as the eternal victim of republican cruelty.
You see the same idea with Me Too.
The evil patriarchy is obsessed with tatted, blue-haired feminists. They all scream "hands off my ovaries!" and believe themselves in a handsmaid tale where men are desperately trying to force them to breed. It's insane, but it's how these people think.
Nixon vs. Woodward, he clearly exposed the dork as the lying Mockingbird he is, always was. They had to create so much propaganda , multimillion dollar films , to solidify the false narrative that normies believe today. He made Woodward piss myself with facts . Watch the interviews , hilarious!
Not sure if this is 💯 % accurate but I read (sorry, no sauce) that while Nixon was predominantly working with the Cabal, he apparently didn’t support their child sex trafficking activities and the Cabal believed they were in danger of being exposed and decided to get rid of him.
This and the other user's comment about Bohemian grove makes me feel are the correct explanation. It connects most of the dots in this post. Thanks for this, I will try to dig up some sauce for it.
The whole spying on DNC just to dispose him sounds very convoluted, and there is bound to be more here. Is it possible Republicans decided to take him down?
I always envision CIA on the Bush side, and Rockefeller+Depop guys on the Clinton side. So maybe the CIA cabal faction took him down when they realised he was not their guy ?
They wanted to paint themselves as victims of the evil republicans who were "nazis" who resorted to illegal spying to stop the poor widdle hippy democrats who just cared about the environment and minority rights.
It's projection. They also want to portray conservatives as evil tyrants obsessed with them while they portray themselves as the eternal victim of republican cruelty.
You see the same idea with Me Too.
The evil patriarchy is obsessed with tatted, blue-haired feminists. They all scream "hands off my ovaries!" and believe themselves in a handsmaid tale where men are desperately trying to force them to breed. It's insane, but it's how these people think.
"I'm a victim and you're obsessed with me".
Nixon vs. Woodward, he clearly exposed the dork as the lying Mockingbird he is, always was. They had to create so much propaganda , multimillion dollar films , to solidify the false narrative that normies believe today. He made Woodward piss myself with facts . Watch the interviews , hilarious!
He crossed the cia and threatened them with exposing the Kenedy murder.
One president already dead for crossing CIA. So you go and threaten to expose them instead of just exposing it.
u/#bigbrains
Definitely in the top hundred of stupidest moves.
Not sure if this is 💯 % accurate but I read (sorry, no sauce) that while Nixon was predominantly working with the Cabal, he apparently didn’t support their child sex trafficking activities and the Cabal believed they were in danger of being exposed and decided to get rid of him.
This and the other user's comment about Bohemian grove makes me feel are the correct explanation. It connects most of the dots in this post. Thanks for this, I will try to dig up some sauce for it.