Used to be that government employees were protected from citizen lawsuits, it was seen a a protection against frivolous suits. But now that our government has become so corrupt, arrogant, and unresponsive, it's a good thing we can now sue these bastards.
You can sue a man/woman at any time if he/she has caused you wrong, harm or injury. You can't use an attorney as they are only able to work within the realm of talking-corpses (corporations). It's a common law proceeding that a judge will try to stifle but you can prevail if you understand your rights and what you need to do.
You can't sue, say Anthony Fauci, for causing harm to millions however. You have to have been directly, personally impacted. For instance if you were jab-injured, or a parent/spouse/child was injured or killed by the jab.
The highest form of complaint-even higher than a grand jury indictment-is a sworn affidavit placed into the public record by one of the sovereign People. Actions commence in the county court (common law) by affidavit of the sovereign. There is no need for a grand jury to be convened and no cause for the police to go out and investigate-all that's required is for a sovereign to write an affidavit and declare "This crime occurred to me" and put it into the county recorder's office. Already, we have seen decisions to resign made by a number of public officers in lieu of contesting the complaints made against them
Authority - AFFIDAVIT V. MOTION
Bench: I have considered the Defense Motions & they are all DENIED.
Real Man: I did not file any motions, I filed affidavits.
Bench: Well I am treating your documents as motions!!
Real Man: AGAIN, I did not file any motions, I filed affidavits; it is a criminal offense to file a false affidavit, I notice I am not under arrest for filing a false affidavit so it is clear that my affidavits are true, correct, and accurate; an affidavit is a statement of truth so my UNCONTESTED AFFIDAVITS are the TRUTH; I’m sure this court isn’t deliberately DENYING THE TRUTH in order to FALSIFY THE RECORD!!! I’m certain it isn’t this court’s intent to FALSIFY THE RECORD AND CREATE DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS...is it???
...........
MORRIS V NATIONAL CASH REGISTER,
&
GROUP V FINLETTER
Defendant is likely to be the only individual, now or in the future, who is willing and able to place a sworn affidavit affirming the herein disclosed facts under penalties of perjury, into the record of this case and as such, in absence of sworn counter-affidavit signed under the penalties of perjury regarding these same facts, laws, caselaws and evidence, Defendant should be the only prevailing party.
Morris v National Cash Register, 44 S.W. 2d 433, clearly states at point #4 that “uncontested allegations in affidavit must be accepted as true.”, and the Federal case of Group v Finletter, 108 F. Supp. 327 states,
“Allegations in affidavit in support of motion must be considered as true in absence of counter-affidavit.”
Clif has been sending out warnings to officials, so they will "knowingly" be breaking the law and their oaths. The trick is to figure out how to go after these leeches after the fact.
According to a 2020 supreme court ruling, Individuals acting in an official govt. action that violate a persons civil rights can be sued, individually, apart from the govt., in certain cases. https://ccrjustice.org/supreme-court-case-tanzin-v-tanvir
I do not know how broadly this ruling can be applied. But, I have heard arguments that claim this SC ruling could potentially be applied quite broadly as a precedent for similar lawsuits.
This is actually what needs to happen. A suit can start with an affidavit on how you were harmed, or how they violated the law or their oath of office. Going after their surety bond seemed to work for some, but it has lost steam. Don't know why.
I have studied a lot of common law during my fight with my employer, which I eventually won. I'm still studying. I have been considering helping those who end up being hurt by the forced jabs. Your post has gives me some ideas about where to focus.
Federal employees have sovereign immunity for most everything they do on the job.
Here in Georgia, the state has giving us the right to sue if the employee denies us a constitutional protected right, but it's an very hard case to.prove and even harder to win.
maybe go after their bond - I don't know anything about that but I do remember reading here on GAW something about their bond and how they will go to great lengths to keep it pristine.
This was looking promising. My fuzzy memory is that it's run into road blocks. Have you seen anything like that? I need to dig into it more, so I don't throw out something useful.
Used to be that government employees were protected from citizen lawsuits, it was seen a a protection against frivolous suits. But now that our government has become so corrupt, arrogant, and unresponsive, it's a good thing we can now sue these bastards.
You can sue a man/woman at any time if he/she has caused you wrong, harm or injury. You can't use an attorney as they are only able to work within the realm of talking-corpses (corporations). It's a common law proceeding that a judge will try to stifle but you can prevail if you understand your rights and what you need to do.
You can't sue, say Anthony Fauci, for causing harm to millions however. You have to have been directly, personally impacted. For instance if you were jab-injured, or a parent/spouse/child was injured or killed by the jab.
The highest form of complaint-even higher than a grand jury indictment-is a sworn affidavit placed into the public record by one of the sovereign People. Actions commence in the county court (common law) by affidavit of the sovereign. There is no need for a grand jury to be convened and no cause for the police to go out and investigate-all that's required is for a sovereign to write an affidavit and declare "This crime occurred to me" and put it into the county recorder's office. Already, we have seen decisions to resign made by a number of public officers in lieu of contesting the complaints made against them
Yes, common law is person to person: how the person trespassed on you, or dishonored a contract.
Authority - AFFIDAVIT V. MOTION Bench: I have considered the Defense Motions & they are all DENIED.
Real Man: I did not file any motions, I filed affidavits.
Bench: Well I am treating your documents as motions!!
Real Man: AGAIN, I did not file any motions, I filed affidavits; it is a criminal offense to file a false affidavit, I notice I am not under arrest for filing a false affidavit so it is clear that my affidavits are true, correct, and accurate; an affidavit is a statement of truth so my UNCONTESTED AFFIDAVITS are the TRUTH; I’m sure this court isn’t deliberately DENYING THE TRUTH in order to FALSIFY THE RECORD!!! I’m certain it isn’t this court’s intent to FALSIFY THE RECORD AND CREATE DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS...is it???
...........
MORRIS V NATIONAL CASH REGISTER, & GROUP V FINLETTER
Defendant is likely to be the only individual, now or in the future, who is willing and able to place a sworn affidavit affirming the herein disclosed facts under penalties of perjury, into the record of this case and as such, in absence of sworn counter-affidavit signed under the penalties of perjury regarding these same facts, laws, caselaws and evidence, Defendant should be the only prevailing party.
Morris v National Cash Register, 44 S.W. 2d 433, clearly states at point #4 that “uncontested allegations in affidavit must be accepted as true.”, and the Federal case of Group v Finletter, 108 F. Supp. 327 states,
“Allegations in affidavit in support of motion must be considered as true in absence of counter-affidavit.”
Great cite. Will have to study up on that one.
Look at Clif highs sci fi world telegram. He regularly posts about how he is suing and warning government officials school boards etc.
Clif has been sending out warnings to officials, so they will "knowingly" be breaking the law and their oaths. The trick is to figure out how to go after these leeches after the fact.
He is suing the governor of his state..maybe others. I am in UK so don't follow that side of things. It's impossible to sue here
According to a 2020 supreme court ruling, Individuals acting in an official govt. action that violate a persons civil rights can be sued, individually, apart from the govt., in certain cases. https://ccrjustice.org/supreme-court-case-tanzin-v-tanvir
I do not know how broadly this ruling can be applied. But, I have heard arguments that claim this SC ruling could potentially be applied quite broadly as a precedent for similar lawsuits.
This is actually what needs to happen. A suit can start with an affidavit on how you were harmed, or how they violated the law or their oath of office. Going after their surety bond seemed to work for some, but it has lost steam. Don't know why.
I have studied a lot of common law during my fight with my employer, which I eventually won. I'm still studying. I have been considering helping those who end up being hurt by the forced jabs. Your post has gives me some ideas about where to focus.
Class action
Federal employees have sovereign immunity for most everything they do on the job.
Here in Georgia, the state has giving us the right to sue if the employee denies us a constitutional protected right, but it's an very hard case to.prove and even harder to win.
maybe go after their bond - I don't know anything about that but I do remember reading here on GAW something about their bond and how they will go to great lengths to keep it pristine.
This was looking promising. My fuzzy memory is that it's run into road blocks. Have you seen anything like that? I need to dig into it more, so I don't throw out something useful.
With a gun. And bullets.