A magnetic field of 1 billion Tesla???? Impossible in known science.
Even creating a 100 Tesla magnetic field is almost impossible. It can be done in short bursts of tiny fractions of a second. Sustained fields are only practical up to a few dozen Tesla. And this is only possible in very expensive and difficult to manufacture high temperature super conductors.
It is basically impossible to imagine the size of a superconducting volume that would be required to generate a billion Tesla. It would almost certainly be larger than a planet.
If the figures they are talking about are even possible, it will require physics that are not currently taught at Caltech. Patents are supposed to allow someone "sufficiently skilled in the art" to understand how to build it. There is nobody on the planet earth who would be "sufficiently skilled in the art" to understand what they are proposing here.
Will be a very interesting world if this is an actual device and not just some theoretical design.
Nice! Well, Kim Clement prophesied things that sound intriguingly similar... so I'm confident it's going to happen. The when and how are still good questions, though. Nice post.
All radioactive atoms have a specific probability of weither theyll decay at that instant or not.
That prob scaled up to a fuckton of atoms and a continuous flow of time gives us a materials "half-life".
That "Half-life" is ingrained into that specific material because of how the fundemental atomic forces act on it. It cant be changed.
Though, just thought experiment: What if we could induce rad decay?
Well, first all reactors would get a turbo-button where its fuel burns (decays) faster. Enormous potential with that.
We can also run nuclear waste through it and make it burn into harmless (relatively) ash, enormous potential there as well.
If you could get whatever process to happen wirelessly you could induce the radioactive potassium, iodine, and sodium inside someones body into decaying all at once. Making an odd sort of weapon.
Probably cause a stealth increase in cancer risk.
Not gonna touch on the other things you brought up, but if only just one of those things are true. We would see some giant tech leaps once they hit mainstream.
A magnetic field of 1 billion Tesla???? Impossible in known science.
Even creating a 100 Tesla magnetic field is almost impossible. It can be done in short bursts of tiny fractions of a second. Sustained fields are only practical up to a few dozen Tesla. And this is only possible in very expensive and difficult to manufacture high temperature super conductors.
It is basically impossible to imagine the size of a superconducting volume that would be required to generate a billion Tesla. It would almost certainly be larger than a planet.
If the figures they are talking about are even possible, it will require physics that are not currently taught at Caltech. Patents are supposed to allow someone "sufficiently skilled in the art" to understand how to build it. There is nobody on the planet earth who would be "sufficiently skilled in the art" to understand what they are proposing here.
Will be a very interesting world if this is an actual device and not just some theoretical design.
Here is a very good interview with the inventor of these patents Salvatore Pais
https://youtu.be/5E6QyAhTB3o
Nice! Well, Kim Clement prophesied things that sound intriguingly similar... so I'm confident it's going to happen. The when and how are still good questions, though. Nice post.
Interesting post. Scary to think if the bad guys have access to this too. Hoping devolution in place.
This tech goes way beyond spaceships. We could be just a few short years from some really cool hoverboards like in back to the future!
I'd say Trump is the only outsider who would ever try to get hidden tech held by black budget programs transferred into public use.
Can't "induce" radioactive decay.
All radioactive atoms have a specific probability of weither theyll decay at that instant or not. That prob scaled up to a fuckton of atoms and a continuous flow of time gives us a materials "half-life".
That "Half-life" is ingrained into that specific material because of how the fundemental atomic forces act on it. It cant be changed.
Though, just thought experiment: What if we could induce rad decay?
Well, first all reactors would get a turbo-button where its fuel burns (decays) faster. Enormous potential with that.
We can also run nuclear waste through it and make it burn into harmless (relatively) ash, enormous potential there as well.
If you could get whatever process to happen wirelessly you could induce the radioactive potassium, iodine, and sodium inside someones body into decaying all at once. Making an odd sort of weapon. Probably cause a stealth increase in cancer risk.
Not gonna touch on the other things you brought up, but if only just one of those things are true. We would see some giant tech leaps once they hit mainstream.
Yes you can induce decay.
Subject U235 to the right neutron field, it will decay more rapidly.
This is how reactors and bombs work.
That's speeding up a nuclear fission reaction (atom splitting). U-235 has the same unchangable half-life.
Uranium doesnt naturally decay by splitting.