Durham trial
(media.communities.win)
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Durham is a special council appointed by the 45th President of the United States to investigate the FISA abuse warrant during the 2016 election. This essentially allowed Obama and crew to spy on the soon to be President's campaign and pin them with the Russia Russia narrative for the coming 2 years. Sussman is the defendant on trial currently, but he is the first domino that should bring down the criminal syndicate. Sussman leads to the crooked FBI, CIA, Clinton Campaign, Obama Admin...ect.
I know I'm missing so many pieces to this story, but this is the culmination of 5 years of investigation. There were no leaks during those 5 years, and some of us questioned if Durham even existed. Now, we know HE DOES EXIST AND NCSWIC.
I'm sure others here can add to it, but that's what I have off the top of my head. I hope this helps you understand in the long run.
Its not much really. Sussman is facing a minor charge of "lying to the feds". Max of 4 years, 2 years on behavior. In all likelihood he gets probation and community service like the other guy did.
The judge ruled that this charge/case can not be linked to hillary or her campaign, or anyone else for that matter. So it stands alone as a single minor charge.
I really dont get why we are hyping this up so much.
Where did the judge say it could not be linked to hillary or her campaign?
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/07/judge-spares-clinton-camp-in-sussmann-ruling-00030887
Believing anything from Politico was your first mistake.
Heres the 24 page ruling.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.121.0.pdf
The judge denied the conspiracy claim made by durhams team.
No where in that order does the judge deny the conspiracy claims. It is stated that, because Sussman is not being charged with conspiracy that they would not allow certain articles of conspiracy to be brought forth during Sussman's trial. No where in that order has the judge said that the case at hand cannot be tied to Hillary or her campaign.
III. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby ORDERED that [58] Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Testimony or Evidence Pertaining to Former FBI Assistant Director Bill Priestap’s and Deputy General Counsel Trisha Anderson’s Notes is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that [59] Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Case if the Special Counsel Does Not Immunize Rodney Joffe is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that [61] Special Counsel’s Motion in Limine is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is further ORDERED that [57] Defendant’s Motion to Preclude the Special Counsel from Presenting Evidence or Argument Regarding Matters Subject to the Attorney-Client Privilege is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as explained on the record on April 27, 2022. SO ORDERED.
Thats what i mean though, the judge denied the "conspiracy" part of the case at the beginning of may.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/07/judge-spares-clinton-camp-in-sussmann-ruling-00030887
They cant link it to anyone. This is a minor charge that stands entirely on its own.
Yes like i was saying, this may lead to other cases later on, but this case in particular is absolutely nothing. A very minor charge.
If another case is built from this then i'll be a little more on board that its something. But we're going to wait weeks for a probation conviction.
I just want everyone to know that this isnt what people are building it up to be. We need to help educate each other on these matters. I mean people are already talking about hanging hillary, not realizing that this case stands on its own as a minor charge and cant be linked to hillary.
Okay, I agree with you there. people seem to be "jumping the gun."
Yeah big time lol. Everyone's calling for hillarys execution based on this case, like wut?
This case is the first concrete link in prosecuting the Clinton-Obama conspiracy to spy on Trump and subvert the election. The endpoints haven't been proven, but this is picking up and pulling the chain ... the anchor is at the end. This case is not the end, it is rather minor on its own, but it seems to have very secure traction.
HOW ARE YOU ON GREAT AWAKENING AND NOT KNOW WHAT DURHAM TRIAL IS ABOUT? HOW DID YOU FIND THIS PLACE LMAOOOOO