If you are a Patriot, what exactly do you have against Q researchers/followers/supporters?
You think we've been duped--that Q is just a CIA psyop designed to pacify us and keep us from doing what we need to do to take our country back.
Ok, so what exactly are we NOT doing that you ARE?
Because to me, from your tone and your intensity and your rhetoric it feels an awful lot like what you're saying is that what we SHOULD be doing is grabbing our guns and storming D.C. and all our state capitols and hanging the traitors by the neck and reinstalling Trump as President.
Is that not what you're saying? If not, what ARE you saying? What makes you, as a fellow freedom loving patriot, better than us? You apparently haven't been duped. So where's your army? Why haven't you stormed the castle gates yet?
Are you suggesting that the only reason YOU haven't stormed the castle gates already is because you haven't convinced US to yet? Because from the looks of it based on the numbers on PDW vs GAW, we're definitely in the minority. If that's what you think needs to be done, what's stopping you?
Could it be because you're full of shit? You may not realize it but like half the shit you guys say over on PDW implies that you buy Q's view of the world anyway. Seems to me you're just too chicken shit to really look into Q and/or too chicken shit to align with it because you don't want to look like an idiot to your liberal masters, or you're just scared of being hurt again like we all were when the election didn't go as we hoped.
So tell me, seriously, if I'm the delusional one, what is my delusion thwarting? How is my delusion holding YOU back from doing what you so clearly want to do? What are you doing today that you think we Q followers aren't already doing? Why come here and try to get the rest of us to be as upset and panicked and miserable as you are--what's the goal exactly?
I don't think you grasp what I'm trying to say.
a)If a liberal calls some white dude racist just because he voted for trump, that is not a true racist. b) If some dude beat the shit out of someone because they were black and nothing more, that dude is racist.
If someone calls someone else a doomer because they doom, that is the correct label. To me dooming is a subset of trolling with the idea to get the other individual to feel defeated and stop doing research or trying to better themselves because all is hopeless.
Calling someone a doomer just because they are part of another tribe is not actually a doomer so I would lump it in with option 1) a)
Please tell me what the word meant and how it has changed? To me it's always meant someone operating at low vibrations trying to shitpost to try to get negative emotions to flow from whoever they are interacting with. Not just trolling but trolling with the nuance of defeatism. The closest thing to it would be kind of like being Black Pilled and not trying to do better and just giving up.
I don't speak for everyone just myself.
As someone who has been around since the voat and days before that - doomers have always existed. It's just a subset of trolling meant to get someone to feel defeated and that nothing will change and to get them to give up and operate at those low vibrations.
And they are a handshake of 36 days.
Biggest problem is that sometimes they aren't trolling, sometimes they are actually themselves depressed, frightened and not seeing things the same. We are usually pretty good about spotting them and giving encouragement. It's when people jump to calling out a doomer before any critical thinking for yourself about what they're saying happens. That's when we have problems. Every clock is right twice a day kind of thing. I know everyone has some level of frustration. Injustice is a hard pill to tolerate for long. It really comes down to the Golden Rule. Treat others the way you want to be treated.
read the title to the post... doomers/non-q-supporters... referring to them being the same ?
are they the same?
No I believe the intent was to be 2 different groups because it would be stupid to call anyone who doesn't believe in Q a doomer.
I think it was meant to be, "A question for 1) Doomers and 2) Non Q supporters"
I apologize for any miscommunication.
I tend to read / as an "or"
based on there not being a distinction in the body, I have to assume it was addressed as an AND...
As opposed to the low vibrations of engaging in the most base of logical fallacies… name calling.
Gotcha.
I don't believe I called anyone a name?
The topic of the thread is about using the pejorative term doomers. Not pointed at you. Sorry if I wasn’t clear.
It's stating someone has a negative outlook. Which can be good or bad depending on the situation.