-
As others have noted, nothing earth-shattering though I did learn a few details that were interesting. I didn't take notes so I'd probably have to see it again to recall what all exactly. A few I do remember - how basically the speed at which people were arrested after J6 was way too fast - they had to be tracking people ahead of time. Another was just how much money is in politics thru non-profits and their role in all this. A third was the AZ whistleblower talking about just how bad it is in terms of taking advantage of the Hispanics there for these purposes.
-
It's well-done in terms of building it for people who know nothing about any of this, and doing so in a way that makes it hard to argue, like how the tech worked etc. While I found the flow a little lurchy, it still did a good job in presenting things in a good order to build the case. Essentially I'd compare it to Out of Shadows in terms of a well-done primer on the topic at hand.
AND A COUPLE MORE SPOILER-Y/ACTUAL DETAILS SO STOP NOW IF ANY SUCH BOTHER YOU
-
Larry Elder is an insufferable tool. Starting out all skeptical then at the end acting like it's so huge, dude where were you when you got cheated. I'm a lot more skeptical of this guy/like him a lot less based on his appearance on the panel here. His first answer was like a smart version of Kamala, a politician saying nothing but taking a paragraph to do it. Blech.
-
One detail I thought was particularly well-done was pointing out how their data led to the arrest of the pair of child murderers - that will really help cement the argument against people saying this data is fake/can't be tied to real people etc.
Worthwhile comments. Thanks.
for us here it is not earth shattering because we have all known this but maybe it will slap some normies up side the head.....some may need a hammer assist...?
Yes, exactly, basically my hope is normie conservatives see it and start refusing to accept "we just have to move on" "there may have been fraud but not enough to change anything" and such like that, and maybe curious centrist dems start seeing it to, and so on. Foot in the door type thing but it's a pretty serious foot if it gets further traction.
Who can hack Fox News' site and put a 2000 Mules banner ad across the top, any takers?
I did a scumbag double feature of 2000 Mules and The Northman. I liked Mules better. Northman was too derivative of Conan The Barbarian and whatnot. More importantly, the mixed crowds I saw the movies with were much more enthusiastic for Mules. Way more audible reactions. It felt like more than just another movie.
Watch free👇
https://trusttheq.com/2000-mules-full-documentary-new-link/
They’ll repair the link. Check back later.
Blocked. Got any updated links?
I thought it was a compelling assertion as well. Have you done any research into this claim beyond what the movie said?
Well the New York Times did, would that count?
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/20/opinion/location-data-national-security.html
They tracked President Trump using a simple form of the tech True the Vote used and just one target.
Now, they are denying geospatial analysis 🤣
I don't really feel the need to. This is probably just the tip of the iceberg in terms of what data they (or [they]) have. I'd say a key takeaway is if we're losing this war we're all probably totally fucked, many of us probably many years ago by now.
“Trust, but verify.”
I was in a hurry before, just realized who I'm talking to - I wouldn'ta even bothered.
Fuck off shill.