The more detailed pattern near the market (remember that only cases on the immediate vicinity of the market were counted if they were not obviously contacted the market or the cases from it closely) is more consistent with a
Gives evidence of Superspreading event on chinese Metro Line at the Hankou Railway Station before reported Huanan Wet Market event
Respiratory virus outbreaks in modern cities will have their centroid of spread located on the largest transportation hub in the city, especially in a city where half of the population commutes using public transport. Even without considering the strong
So viruses like SARS-Cov-2 have big spreading events at the transportation centers of the city like the train station or a bus station.
The lineage v and A genomes, before the market-associated B lineage, is substantially milder than lineage B in term of pathogenesis. They leave behind RNA and IgG in Wuchang—but not symptomology which was
The virus variant before the one that spread in the reported "Wuhan Market" was milder and not as harmful.
@Daoyu15 Replying to @tony_vandongen
Shows chinese hieroglyphic document
"the neighborhood of Huanan market" was used as a criterion for "continued epidemiological surveillance" happening all the way until ~04-05/01/2020.
@tony_vandongen
As @Daoyu15 pointed out, one reason for the clustering of early cases around the Huanan wet market without a direct link to it was that authorities were actively trying to identify cases in that area.
The main cluster of cases within the 1.5km radius was actually just north of the Hankou railway station—cases cluster around metro stations not markets when a spatially resolved map of even just the cases counted within 1.5km of the Huanan market, was used.
It is consistent with Superspreading of a small proportion of the viral diversity in Wuhan in the city’s main transport hub compounded by strong selective bias in early and retrospective case diagnosis, and not with an “origin of spread from the market”.
All samples contained human reads in them, whereas no sample with virus lacked human reads from the data they revealed.
(meaning no virus sample was found that only infected animals and not humans.
it is highly doubtful that ANY original animal infections, if at all, would still be visible at the time of sampling. The initial date of infection happened in [December-9-2019] for the market. Whatever RNA that event left is kept in a highly septic environment in higher than room temperature for more than 22 days before sampling is commenced. By that time, the original virus or animal RNA would have been completely destroyed due to the high room-temperature lability of RNA especially in a septic environment such as the market. All that were left in the environmental RNA samples would have been recently deposited by humans, with a mean date of deposition being close to [December-12-2019].
Sampling— while gDNA survives for years in the environment, vRNA are destroyed within a week in that kind of environment. All virus samples would have been secondary to the human cases by the time of deposition, using whatever methods of transmission (contamination, even spillback from humans into the animals if there are any).
Less than half of what [virus samples] that was on the records were reported to the WHO, less than 2/5 of that that was confirmable and still had any samples left (if it was even all of that actually existed). who did it? the Wuhan Municipal Health
Peter "Pure Baloney" Daszak's lies exposed yet again
Referencing @PeterDaszak Tweet:
This is a widely circulated conspiracy theory. This piece describes work I'm the lean on & labs I've collaborated w/ for 15 yrs. They do not have live or dead bats in them. There is no evidence anywhere that this happened...
Goes more in depth with details on Wuhan bat research and inconsistencies with the Wuhan bat in wet market initial covid event theory
Second link: https://archive.ph/dmOXT
Gives evidence of Superspreading event on chinese Metro Line at the Hankou Railway Station before reported Huanan Wet Market event
So viruses like SARS-Cov-2 have big spreading events at the transportation centers of the city like the train station or a bus station.
The virus variant before the one that spread in the reported "Wuhan Market" was milder and not as harmful.
@Daoyu15 Replying to @tony_vandongen
Shows chinese hieroglyphic document
"the neighborhood of Huanan market" was used as a criterion for "continued epidemiological surveillance" happening all the way until ~04-05/01/2020.
@tony_vandongen
https://archive.md/uFlxC
Third Link: https://archive.ph/9znGJ
(meaning no virus sample was found that only infected animals and not humans.
Fourth Link: https://archive.ph/dsJ15
https://archive.ph/CrNOd
https://archive.ph/erBol
@BillyBostickson
https://archive.ph/NnQIm
Referencing @PeterDaszak Tweet:
Goes more in depth with details on Wuhan bat research and inconsistencies with the Wuhan bat in wet market initial covid event theory
Superspreader or intentional release in high foot traffic areas?
Both