If you reject God then nothing is evil. EVERYTHING is subjective and ultimately pointless.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 RED PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Do you deny this?
Looks like you left something out....
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness
I wonder why you left that out?
God made nature, of course He made things evident in it. Romans 1:20
"For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse."
Scripture tells us the law of God is written on every mans heart.
Rejecting God = Rejecting objective standards of morality.
When you do this NOTHING matters ultimately which is clearly the point of the meme.
Nice trick you just employed. I am not going to grace you with a God debate. I am sick to my stomach over such things.
You skirted a question. A question that goes to the heart of your contempt. And it is simply a yes or no.
A yes would entail you to stop projecting your views onto others. A no answer would condemn you. .....
Truly a unfortunate position to be in.
What you said translates to: reject my version of God, reject my standards & laws. For that is your identification.
Yet, you still have the opportunity to learn something, and it is yours to choose to know or not.
Nature does not lie, does not play favorites. We either are in harmony with its workings or we are not. The bed we make is ours to reside in, due to cause and effect.
But since the laws of Nature escape your consciousness, there is really not much to say, other than, progress on your way. It is hard for those who accept authority as the truth, instead of the truth as the authority.
Redtoe-skipper out.
"The fear of the Lord is the beginning of all wisdom."
Q doesn't tell us to pray to nature.
You keep saying "truth" but you can't account for absolute truth in your worldview.
Your question presupposes your worldview, not mine. I reject your baseless worldview since I used to hold it before I grew and learned. You are assuming I've never been where you are. A laughably ignorant assumption.
Laws of nature and logic presuppose a law giver. That is God.
You live in a world of subjectivity. A world that doesn't support your position.
Where do you get "truth" without God? You have no objective standards to appeal to ultimately. You are matter floating through space acted upon by time and chance signifying nothing. Your brain isn't "thinking" it's just a chemical reaction based off of input and stimuli. You can't get "truth" from a chemical reaction.
You haven't though this through. Atheisms is dumb and makes you a fool that's building your house on the sand.
With all the odd old ends stolen forth from holy writ, this and that, it only shows your capacity to repeat something. Very good. Congrats.
It takes away from the issue at hand.
Bandwagonman said: I see objective morality, while not believing in your god. And I concur with him.
How do you read? Have you really even read or contemplated what he claims? Or what I am writing? Or were you just shooting from the hip, and knee-jerking?
I did is demonstrate that there are people who do not belief in YOUR god but do see objective morality.
On the one hand it falsifies the assertions in the meme, which is not even worthy of the name. There is no getting around it.
It is bewildering how you can miss this, as this would be a perfect commonality. But since you refuse to even look into this matter......denial kicks in.
See Q post in relation to the method of critical free thinking.
Is it not interesting to contemplate that Q started posting on the most reviled place? /Pol? Not from the religious pulpits, but a place where the most disregarded people exchange information: autists. Why would that be? Could it be that people like the autists have a behavioral advantage when it comes to critical thinking? A wider view of how society works, how people work?
Something to ponder.
If the discussion is: how can we make clear that those rejecting objectivism, are basically solipsists, which is basically the essence of the system these pedos want us to live under, yeah, I guess we can have that discussion.
As far as I am concerned, the direction you are steering this discussion is a still born, does not yield any knowledge and wisdom.
The fear of the lord is the beginning of all wisdom.
You keep saying "objective standards" others hold without naming them. That's telling.