It seems to me that Durham has used a single charge of a relatively minor crime, against a relatively small player, to force a larger conspiracy into the public eye.
He has also used it to demonstrate it is practically impossible for the prosecution of a Dem operative to receive a fair hearing in D.C., which also can be construed as a conspiracy unto itself.
Bingo! Many have complained that it's just a lousy charge of lying to the FBI, when in fact it's the beginning of a much larger conspiracy. This is how conspiracy cases are built.
It seems to me that Durham has used a single charge of a relatively minor crime, against a relatively small player, to force a larger conspiracy into the public eye.
He has also used it to demonstrate it is practically impossible for the prosecution of a Dem operative to receive a fair hearing in D.C., which also can be construed as a conspiracy unto itself.
This ^^^BIGLY^^^
Still waiting
We all are, fren. We all are..
not true... the only proof presented to the jury was James Baker's testimony that its what he said.
both the Judge and the Defense team dominated the court room... you should prepare yourself for an innocent verdict
I've listened to the whole thing myself, I don't need someone to summarize what happened. https://www.youtube.com/c/RandRLawAZ
3 hours a day for the last 2 weeks.
Bingo! Many have complained that it's just a lousy charge of lying to the FBI, when in fact it's the beginning of a much larger conspiracy. This is how conspiracy cases are built.
I like how it played out. Entered a fuck ton of evidence into the record. That’s worth an acquittal alone!