But I'm referencing the one and ONLY health modality that actually CAN "prove it". Scientifically no less. Whereas every other popular health modality cannot prove a single one of their unsupported hypothesis as to dis-ease causation.
Why are you so completely convinced I can't prove it? Admittedly, this seems to be the most common reaction I hear from people, but I don't understand why that is?
Rather than telling me I can't prove it, why not instead ask me if I can prove it?
Can you prove it? I, of course, mean you yourself. Not you cherry picking studies from the fringes of the internet done by some random no name who has no other history or documentation about who they are.
Well, technically speaking, from my own personal experiences, I can only prove perhaps a dozen cases I've dealt with thus far where I had head CT scans.
But the guy who figured it all out proved literally every single dis-ease via this same method. Not only that he harmonized the brainCT with the organ/tissue changes along with the psyche/conflict theme. Utterly remarkable.
And if that wasn't enough, he figured out that there was actually a "biological purpose" for our dis-eases, rather than the insane dis-ease models that we've been indoctrinated into believing in. Beyond remarkable. He was truly a genius of remarkable ability.
And that's why you've almost certainly never heard of him of course.
All dis-ease arises via unexpected conflicting life situations...but nobody wants to hear it. Good times!
No, the problem is, you can't prove it.
It is an interesting hypothesis, but there is no way to actually study it scientifically.
You can't quantify trauma in any meaningful way to prove that Trauma X caused Disease Y.
Therefore, it is an interesting idea, but not worth focusing on because there is no way to prove it, or even to prevent ill health via this concept.
But I'm referencing the one and ONLY health modality that actually CAN "prove it". Scientifically no less. Whereas every other popular health modality cannot prove a single one of their unsupported hypothesis as to dis-ease causation.
Why are you so completely convinced I can't prove it? Admittedly, this seems to be the most common reaction I hear from people, but I don't understand why that is?
Rather than telling me I can't prove it, why not instead ask me if I can prove it?
Can you prove it? I, of course, mean you yourself. Not you cherry picking studies from the fringes of the internet done by some random no name who has no other history or documentation about who they are.
Well, technically speaking, from my own personal experiences, I can only prove perhaps a dozen cases I've dealt with thus far where I had head CT scans.
But the guy who figured it all out proved literally every single dis-ease via this same method. Not only that he harmonized the brainCT with the organ/tissue changes along with the psyche/conflict theme. Utterly remarkable.
And if that wasn't enough, he figured out that there was actually a "biological purpose" for our dis-eases, rather than the insane dis-ease models that we've been indoctrinated into believing in. Beyond remarkable. He was truly a genius of remarkable ability.
And that's why you've almost certainly never heard of him of course.