YOU WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO SLEEP AT NIGHT IF YOU KNEW WHO WAS REALLY BEHIND BITCOIN
(www.instagram.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
I personally dont like the idea of digital currency, at all. anything can be hacked if your determined to do it, and if you have the money, hacking services can be bought. so its the elites digital playground from that fact alone. physical tender, with honest monetary values, is the only way. bring back the gold standard and we might have a chance again.
I like gold, but no one has cracked sha-256 yet and it is unlikely without a major breakthrough in computing power. If you keep your crypto on exchanges, yes those can and have been hacked. If you keep your private key in a paper wallet, those are nearly impossible to hack without using a wrench to beat the owner up with to gain access to it, but people can do that with gold too. Stored properly crypto is about as secure as keeping gold in a safe.
Devil's Advocate Mode:
What if they have but haven't told you yet?
What if I told you, that your hard drive has a backdoor built into it?
Or, you could read about it for yourself. Start Search: Backdoor hard drive Kaspersky.
With Bitcoin all possible attack vectors are common knowledge, anyone could try at any time. The reason nobody has succeeded yet is because it would be too expensive or to hard to hide such operation which would have to take place in a centralized location where it's vulnerable.
Secure encryption is open source and well tested, the only way to break it is through brute force.
Digital vs physical is not in any way relevant. The real threat is centralization as in who controls the money/medium of exchange/currency. For instance:
Does that apply to ballots as well?
From the control aspect yes. Reject proprietary digital system, accept open source systems. Tho in a voting system people are still too ignorant to bother with verification so paper becomes safer because it's easier to understand for the average Joe, at least in theory.
That said, there's plenty of ways to cheat with paper too, complexity, drop boxes, mules, cover up the windows and kick out the observers are just a few examples.
Even open source will have issues. Machines work in levels from components through drivers and operating systems to apps and databases. We have seen how Supermicro had some Chinese-made motherboards "infected" with rogue bugs. Some of us will remember how Intel had a bug in their Pentium processors.
Even if the software you know about is open source it is difficult to prove that that is the code that actually ran. Although paper systems have issues adding something else on top just increases the opportunity for cheating.
All that is before you add the situation where users can insert USB sticks into the machines. Extra code could be written into hidden sectors, for instance.
Then there is the possibility of invisible wireless links like wifi or Bluetooth.
Here is a voting machine demo
What percentage of our money is in paper? Very little.
We can’t have a digital economy and physical money. It seems like a conundrum. It had to happen. Flynn has a tweet from 2015 saying btc is digital gold, it was inevitable. I’m very well aware of your concerns. But the NWO is complete, either we decentralize and remove the deep state, fix the elections so the people control this tech, or we get the Klaus reset. The Fed is collapsing. We will be digital.