Analysis of Leftists Attempt To Keep Power In Texas
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
You're saying PA was (deliberately) given false information by his subordinates to make him the scapegoat in order to keep him off the city council? Where did you get the information that PA "...was told by his officer faulty information."? PA allegedly owns a storage facility and, unless it was false, he slams POTUS on the front page of that website so... I'm thinking he's not much of a conservative.
Then the building across the school field, being owned by the city, had a tenant manufacturing uniforms, W-D (acquired by VF which is in bed with the [R] family). They laid off the majority of their local workers in 2018, moving those operations south (west) of the border and the then-mayor sent a letter to POTUS that (I think) you're implying has some significance. I'm not following where the "oN" you highlighted is supposed to tie-in to.
So, the closure of the uniform manufacturing operations was to cause a tax deficit which would require property taxes to be raised, causing pain to the residents who would then blame Republicans?
The upshot here is that this shooting incident was orchestrated to both promote a gun-grab/anti-2A sentiment as well as remove a conservative (?) from the city council, all as a means to blame Republicans in the upcoming elections?
Also what the hell does Tarrant County and Brownsville TX have to do with Uvalde TX?
Local officials control property taxes. School boards are the main cause of skyrocketing property taxes in Texas. Leftists have this one ability to hurt conservatives badly even though the state government is republiclan.
Voting out school boards in May hurts that ability. They are trying to make people hurt. Since they can't use the state government, they use the city councils and school boards. They didn't expect parents to knock them out of so many school boards and council positions. Usually conservatives don't bother with small, local elections so the Left installs its people there in even the reddest of states.
Go to Oklahoma. At the state level it's all red. Go to the school board and it's full of leftists. This is a fundamental weakness. They've never had to worry about the local races because they never got challenged in local elections.
May 7th they got a taste of doom.
The baby formula panic. The push to scare parents. They're trying everything they can to change the narrative and get the pressure off local races.
Tarrant and Brownsville are just examples of how badly they got voted out of school boards in early May. This is why they needed a drastic change in tactics. They got beat out it in even south "blue" counties in Texas that turned red in 2020.
Their flip to red prevented the cheat in Harris from being enough to steal the state for Biden (and rural vote showed up in historic numbers). They thought it was a blip, but even the local elections in those hispanic areas are flipping to conservatives. it scares the hell out of democrats.
They got driven out at the state level, but they've NEVER been pushed out at the local level.
Not sure if you were intending this for me or the OP, but I think OP's inclusion of these headlines you bring up was to illustrate that conservatives have been gaining power in parts of Texas and, like his post title implies, the left is trying to keep this loss of their power from continuing. Apparently this Pete A dude, being attacked by MSM, ran on fiscal conservativism to win a city council seat (according to OP) so it's likening what has happened in those two other areas to a conservative takeover of the reins of power. (As mentioned in my above comment, I haven't been convinced Pete A is a conservative).
Could be as well. I pose one theory here.
The "oN" is just highlighted because I don't think it was just a typo. Trump also would put "THe" in a lot of his tweets back in the day and other typos. I think it's sometimes one of their methods of hiding certain messages. I don't know if it means anything, but sometimes posts are for me to go back and find the information.
The implication is that the warehouse was more than warehouse. Uvalde is right in one of the most strategic locations in a known and major drug smuggling corridor. Right now Southern California towns are being taken over by cartels. Even Texas border towns have long had a problem with cartels. There is no way Uvalde doesn't have their tentacles in it.
It's where two major highways meet and it's next to an airport with a heavy traffic flow. It's the perfect conduit for trafficking goods. A pipeline from the border to the rest of Texas and the US. That's the implication about the warehouse. It's also connected to the Rothschilds and Vanity Fair corporation (VF).
Cartels are all over that town even if they're well hidden, they are there.
Anything associated with the [R] family is suspect, agreed. VF acquired the uniform manufacturing firm then moved operations to MX during POTUS's term so it might have had an element of wanting to be free from scrutiny. Thirty cartel members would be easier to fake (as honest workers in a reputable firm) than a couple hundred. The proximity to the border makes me wonder if there might be tunnels under that city-owned site.
It sounds more like you're implying that the relocation of manufacturing operations and raising of taxes might be to drive out more residents and solidify the grip of cartels in that town. The swamp runs deep and wide.
Also, there is a uhaul facility and storage right next to that warehouse. Google Earth shows 19 uhaul vehicles there. This town has 1500 people. Why 19 uhauls? Perfect for moving drugs or people.