79 posted 2 years ago by pede_23509 2 years ago by pede_23509 +80 / -1 32 comments share 32 comments share save hide report block hide replies
The jury isnt looking at that they had to find the defendant guilty or innocent by the proof the prosecuter had. He proved the defendant was guilty and the jury still said not guilty. That tells me the jury was corrupt and it was all BS.
The defense made a big deal about materiality and the prosecution spent a fair amount of time trying to prove materiality.
No... would you happen to have a link?
Disregard...lol... I see you were shamed into posting...lol... rough bunch around here! 🤣