-2
pede_23509 -2 points ago +3 / -5

He's not. I'd explain it, but you're to stupid to understand different. Much like the people the fake preacher Lin Wood preys on. Or are you one of the people Lin Wood pays to post on his behalf?

0
pede_23509 0 points ago +1 / -1

So tired of the people who really do not understand the First Amendment, and we should be really talking about the rest of the Constitution in these forums.

-6
pede_23509 -6 points ago +6 / -12

Funny the volume coming from Lin Wood... And no one else. Not quite the personality I would choose to stand behind.

-13
pede_23509 -13 points ago +2 / -15

Lin Wood kept a client in jail, admitted to recommending it, while raising money in the client's name for his foundation.

-16
pede_23509 -16 points ago +2 / -18

Lin Wood is losing credibility sharing personal conversations in this meltdown, to distract from keeping a client in jail against their wishes, while raising money for his foundation in the imprisoned one's name.

Is that ethical? Asking for a friend.

-11
pede_23509 -11 points ago +3 / -14

Lin Wood is distracting from how Lin Wood screwed over Kyle Rittenhouse.

-14
pede_23509 -14 points ago +3 / -17

Lin Wood screwed over Kyle Rittenhouse. Lin Wood confirmed it. Lin Wood sucks for this, among other things. I'll pray for Lin Wood's soul, for what he did to that boy.

-11
pede_23509 -11 points ago +2 / -13

Lin Wood screwed over Kyle Rittenhouse. Lin Wood confirmed it. Lin Wood sucks for this, among other things. I'll pray for Lin Wood's soul, for what he did to that boy.

Lin Wood is damaging his own credibility by sharing all these private conversations. Who is ever going to trust Lin Wood again?

Shills and bots like Lin Wood a lot. I wonder why that is? Asking for a friend.

-5
pede_23509 -5 points ago +2 / -7

Lin Wood's Meltdown, precipitated by the revelation of how POORLY Lin Wood handled the situation, is doing nothing positive to build on anything. If Lin Wood has evidence of malfeasance, why hasn't he brought it earlier? Why is he bringing it now? What concrete evidence is he bringing? He never brought the evidence of his claims against anyone else. It's just Lin Wood running Lin Wood's mouth.

I'll pray for him, and all who are worshiping the false idol of Lin Wood. Discernment is good, division is not. Keeping people in jail on purpose to raise money for your own foundation in their name is not a good thing. Distracting people from that fact, causing hate and division is also not a good thing.

0
pede_23509 0 points ago +8 / -8

What Gen. Flynn wrote is what is called a classy post.

Lin Wood could learn a lesson from this. Lin Wood is causing a ruckus for everyone else, because Lin Wood wants to deflect he's got a client who thinks Lin Wood f#cked him over.

Lin Wood's real, only problem is Lin Wood. Stop with the divisive meltdown Lin Wood.

Lin Wood would like my post, because it says Lin Wood a lot.

0
pede_23509 0 points ago +5 / -5

I bet that won't happen again after Lin Wood's melt down these past few days !!!

-1
pede_23509 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Y'know? We forgot one of my fav teams, Team Grenell.

I like Team Patel, too.

-1
pede_23509 -1 points ago +2 / -3

I'm on Team USA ... which means there is room for which ever Team God you're on as well as being big enough to have Team Flynn, Team Powell, Team Byrne, Team Lindell, Team Trump, Team Gulliani, Team Wood, and Team <insert the name you want I've left off> all on the same side.

Just have some butter on your popcorn when you're watching some folks have meltdowns.

2
pede_23509 2 points ago +7 / -5

Why does Lin Wood want us choosing sides? Why is Lin Wood drawing lines where they don't need to be drawn?

That's kind of kooky to me.

-1
pede_23509 -1 points ago +2 / -3

I do not think that Gen. Flynn is having a melt down this past week.

-2
pede_23509 -2 points ago +4 / -6

Watching Lin Woods melt down ... yup, I've got butter on this popcorn.

-2
pede_23509 -2 points ago +1 / -3

This one is not blurred and it's the official POTUS account ::

https://twitter.com/POTUS/status/1460987569970479104

0
pede_23509 0 points ago +4 / -4

Look on c-span to see if it was blurred.

Consider the source of the video you are watching, and the Hatch Act.

If it is on an OFFICIAL Government channel, it won't be blurred.

If it is on a private or political channel, it will be blurred.

1
pede_23509 1 point ago +4 / -3

Check on C-SPAN to see if it's blurred.

They are blurring it on non official ( party accounts, personal accounts) because Hatch Act.

view more: Next ›