The bigger issue seems to be one of presentation. Having an opinion contrary to prevailing thought is a lot of how research and new insights can be discovered and shared. Indeed that draws out stimulating conversation and helps the community.
I think the point u/sun_wolf was making (please correct me if I'm wrong) is just this: regardless if you were correct in your assumptions, many people don't want to hear them when they are mixed with non-witty diatribe.
For example, you may have been 100% correct about sussman's verdict, but I don't care as much as I should due to you driving your point home while saying I should feel butthurt due to all the pounding I've taken being an FBI depository.
If your method of communication includes your point and also calling me a glowie nazi who should rot in the 7th circle of hell just because I didn't admit your point is the only correct one without giving it more than 5 minutes thought..... well yeah, I may have an issue with that person dispite how right they were.
This is the kind of stuff happening lately. I think we can come up with these conclusions without the antics.
Not you personally of course, just driving the point home. My $0.02.
I definitely hear you and agree 100%, and maybe I poorly communicated with lack of examples, but I intended to express that the diatribes/name-calling/bashing you mention, is exactly the rhetoric many of these labeled “doomers” face. I get that this is the common reaction when dealing with actual shills/glowies, but several anons are being degraded and insulted as if they were actual shills/glowies, for plain or even well thought-out theories that are skeptical/doubtful of the more popular ones here.
I’m sure theres probably users that go full-on lash out when expressing their own theories and encountering criticism/doubt, but the way I’ve seen “doomers” get dragged through the mud and taunted, when delivery wasn’t offensive/questionable... It makes me wonder about the direction of GAW as we go through the storm.
For the most part, spot on.
The bigger issue seems to be one of presentation. Having an opinion contrary to prevailing thought is a lot of how research and new insights can be discovered and shared. Indeed that draws out stimulating conversation and helps the community.
I think the point u/sun_wolf was making (please correct me if I'm wrong) is just this: regardless if you were correct in your assumptions, many people don't want to hear them when they are mixed with non-witty diatribe.
For example, you may have been 100% correct about sussman's verdict, but I don't care as much as I should due to you driving your point home while saying I should feel butthurt due to all the pounding I've taken being an FBI depository.
If your method of communication includes your point and also calling me a glowie nazi who should rot in the 7th circle of hell just because I didn't admit your point is the only correct one without giving it more than 5 minutes thought..... well yeah, I may have an issue with that person dispite how right they were.
This is the kind of stuff happening lately. I think we can come up with these conclusions without the antics.
Not you personally of course, just driving the point home. My $0.02.
I definitely hear you and agree 100%, and maybe I poorly communicated with lack of examples, but I intended to express that the diatribes/name-calling/bashing you mention, is exactly the rhetoric many of these labeled “doomers” face. I get that this is the common reaction when dealing with actual shills/glowies, but several anons are being degraded and insulted as if they were actual shills/glowies, for plain or even well thought-out theories that are skeptical/doubtful of the more popular ones here.
I’m sure theres probably users that go full-on lash out when expressing their own theories and encountering criticism/doubt, but the way I’ve seen “doomers” get dragged through the mud and taunted, when delivery wasn’t offensive/questionable... It makes me wonder about the direction of GAW as we go through the storm.