People like Kash Patel and Gregg Phillips have been red-pilled for quite some time, but something happened and now they are more willing to associate themselves with alternative media and Anons all the sudden. Why?
By associating with alternative media who talk about topics deemed taboo by the media, they risk their reputation and their ability to produce income. The only reason they would do so is if they have seen something to suggest that we in alternative media are on to something. We are over the target.
What happened? What do they know that we don’t? Why the sudden promotion of alternative news sources?
Durham… Election Fraud… all of which is intertwined with worldwide bio-terrorism…
The precipice draws near.
-Clandestine
Great point. That's why I mentioned the Darwin aspect because it could be a type of natural selection. Not that I am full on board with the missing link, but I do believe there is something to the self organizing thing. Just seems strange to me that guys like Cates and Conservative Treehouse are so adamantly anti-Q when they are otherwise open to anything if that's where the evidence takes them.
PS. I've been watching things for quite a few years now. Consider Bannon and what he is doing. Decidedly non-Q. (Don't really know if anti-Q is the right word, because he's not trying to rip down Q)
But he is focused on some really important stuff.
I used to wonder if Bannon was part of the Q team. I still think it's possible. But the thing is, in a military operation, different soldiers and different teams have different roles and jobs, and objectives to achieve for the overall goal.
Bannon could well be so assertively non-Q because his role and job involves objectives that require that to be the case. For example, Bannon's warroom is seriously pushing into the mainstream of conservative America in a powerful way. Could he have done that if he was painted by the Media and all the shills as a Q follower or supporter for the past 2 or 3 years?
Already Bannon had the label of "conspiracy theorist" due to his associations with Andrew Breitbart, etc.
So, I don't take his non-Q stance simply at face value. He may actually believe that Q is larp or is fake, but I doubt it. He's far too smart, and too aligned with Trump and the MAGA work that Q is a powerful element for. Or, he may just be perfectly pragmatic: "Don't need to pay attention to this Q thing. We've got enough to do right here...."
Don't know.
But the point is, camouflage is often an important part of military activity. So, who knows... ?
Bannon gave a hat tip to anons and the q forum. He said we did great research
Yes, that's right. Good point!
Personally, I really like having non-Q related sources that are serious about all the right things. Makes for an excellent break sometimes.
Plus if non-Q sources (like Devolution) come to similar conclusions it strengthens our thesis.
Bannon is all over this Uvalde situation. He's been nearly the only one specifically focusing on the border for over a year. His assets in that location are bringing information not available from msm. This is reaching a wider venue than the Q folks could ever hope for. The story is very close to outing a facet of the IC wet works.
DOn't know about conserve treehouse, but if you are talking about Brian Cates, dude, Brian Cates is fully and completely on board with Q and the anons. He's quoting them (e.g. Pepe Lives Matter, Dave Hayes praying Medic, Jordan Sather, We the Media, X22, etc) and forwarding their telegram posts all the time, constantly.
I don't know about Duane Cates. Haven't seen any of his stuff for ages. But Brian is fully on board.
(He may not have been, back in 2017/2018, but he's a serious journalist and thinker, fact-based thinker, so I would not expect him to just jump on board with something he wasn't certain about.
Also, his Twitter account back in the day was Draw and Strike. His avatar was a photo of Jeff Sessions. I first noticed this when pointed towards his account back in early 2018, by someone posting on the Great Awakening at Reddit. This also was a time when Q was saying "Trust Sessions".
So, I don't know when Brian got on board, if he was on from the start or not, but there is no doubt that now, he fully on board. Spend a bit of time on his telegram channel and you'll see that very quickly. https://t.me/drawandstrikechannel
Or are you talking about Duane, his brother (?)
Early on Brian Cates was saying "I have no opinion about Q and do not want to look into anything other than open source documents. You do you" While he simultaneously would do things like have an avatar of Jeff Sessions, as you point out, or even use some Q phrases straight from a post.
So IMO early on he was always essentially confirming Q things but keeping it technically detached from Q. I got the impression that it was a "same message different messenger" situation intentionally geared towards people that would be too embarrassed even internally to be associated with "crazy Q people." As Q seemed less and less crazy he morphed into retweeting Q accounts, etc. It all seems very engineered to me but I could be wrong.
Interdasting.
So why did you write that he is "anti-Q"?
"Same message, different messenger" Yes, that's the thing. I haven't heard it expressed like that before, but that's strategic action right there.
I was being lazy. He was Q indifferent and Treehouse is vehemently anti-Q. Seemed coordinated to me, like a spectrum.