“The key of this case, in my opinion, was not necessarily getting a guilty verdict for Sussmann… What we got was the evidence… The key for us - and the fact for Donald Trump’s case against all these individuals - is that we got the connection between Hillary Clinton, through Robby Mook's testimony… and the FBI… These are all critical and prove the collusion. That’s what I got out of this and is more important to me than Sussman behind bars.” https://t.me/TheStormHasArrived17/9895
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
The problem is, this not- guilty verdict will be a disincentive for others to cooperate or tell the truth. It is a statement that lying will always be just fine in DC. This has set a new precedent.
This would be my take as well if they hadn’t essentially proved Sussman, HRC, and the FBI are guilty of seditious conspiracy and RICO violations in this trial.
He’s not guilty of lying to the FBI. Doesn’t mean he isn’t guilty of other charges not yet brought by the special counsel
My problem is this. They could have video evidence of him doing all kinds of illegal activities, and the jurors will never find him guilty. You can't have jurors like this that are practically hand picked by the defence. It's a sham. None of them will EVER be found guilty with jurors like this. On the flip side, these jurors would convict Trump of crimes against humanity, just because. The system is broken.