These two articles were written hours apart on the same day, about the same state, by the same journalist....
You can’t make it up.
(media.greatawakening.win)
📺 MEDIA STUPIDITY
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
Look up theory definition. It's a WAG.
Big bang Theory, Theory of evolution, Theory of relativity as a few examples among many. All of these are being proven wrong in current scientific, astrophysics, archeological, and genealogy fields.
My comment stands.
I can’t wait for some serious Biblical archeology finds to be revealed
Already been a lot, they're just suppressed big time. Wouldn't want any Biblical validation to get out to the masses, dontcha know. There's a few channels on YT that dedicate to Ancient Archaeology, unsuppressed, to tell the real stories of our past.
Robert Sepehr is a great one and known as "The most dangerous archaeologist in the world". There's a few more and should pop up in the sidebar after viewing Roberts stuff.
I see I'm conversing with a moron. Reading comprehension is preferable when on a forum....kind of important.
Had you stopped a moment instead of ranting like a leftist and thought about what you just said, you'd understand why I'm saying this now.
Example:
What, a Theorist or "Right"? Your literary skills aren't exactly coherent so I'll address both. First, I literally said I wasn't a theorist, but AM a factualist. I don't present bullshit Theories that do not have provable data behind it. Second, as for being "right", well, I am, so let's just play this out to prove it.
To Wit: since you couldnt be bothered to look up the definition of a Theory to prove yourself wrong as I had suggested, here it is for you from Websters.
"Plausible", "belief", "Ideal or Hypothetical", "unproved assumption", "Conjecture" are all things defining what a Theory is; i.e. a WAG.
In layman terms, Corky, a better understanding of what you spout off would go a long way to looking less ignorant. You can pull that BS on Fakebook or Twatter, but not here.
Contextually and definitively different in every way.
An established Theory; e.g. Big Bang Theory that is wrongfully taught as fact, and pondering possibilities without affirming it's plausibility as fact are not the same. I do not expect someone whose mental capacity is on par with a Golden Retriever to understand that, but I felt a glimmer of hope in offering the explanation to you anyway. Either it'll sink in or you'll begin dragging your ass on the carpet. My money is on the latter.
Edit: I've scored between 148 and 152 on several IQ tests, by request. So technically, yes, that does make me a Genius according to MENSA rules of the required 140 to qualify. You know, since you brought it up.