This was posted a week ago and stickied. Then it was posted AGAIN the other day and stickied.
Are we running out if things to sticky? I agree this is important but what would be better for all is to post what NORMIES and others are saying about it vs the same article over and over.
I love gaw but this is a lot in a very short span of time. - let’s now look for the results of this publication! Is the dude who wrote it still cedentialed or has the cabal gotten to him? Has anyone used this article to win over a normie?
Personally I used this article when it was posted last week to help my son’s school understand when they tell my 17 year old pharmacy student he can’t have an internship without the clot shot what they are really saying. This was folllowed up with the stats on young adult males and myocarditis and pericarditis as well as the Ohio state pending legislation on the vaccine fairness act.
All of the articles were compelling, but this publication from NIH caused the internship director to have another conversation with organizations who take interns and now my son can be in the program next year and only needs to sign a covid waiver and prove he has the normal “titters”(goofy word but I think it means antibodies). I was inches from calling that Ohio attorney and sue if the schools and all the facilities as my son is a straight a student and has no behavioural problems on record.
At the end of the day this report IS important - but let’s discuss how we can use it instead of giving the appearance that we aren’t reading our own forum and just posting the same thing over and over. With other posts I’ve ive seen mods with different takes on the same thing or impacts - but this is just copy paste. Tia for listening.
This was posted a week ago and stickied. Then it was posted AGAIN the other day and stickied.
Are we running out if things to sticky? I agree this is important but what would be better for all is to post what NORMIES and others are saying about it vs the same article over and over.
I love gaw but this is a lot in a very short span of time. - let’s now look for the results of this publication! Is the dude who wrote it still cedentialed or has the cabal gotten to him? Has anyone used this article to win over a normie?
Personally I used this article when it was posted last week to help my son’s school understand when they tell my 17 year old pharmacy student he can’t have an internship without the clot shot what they are really saying. This was folllowed up with the stats on young adult males and myocarditis and pericarditis as well as the Ohio state pending legislation on the vaccine fairness act.
All of the articles were compelling, but this publication from NIH caused the internship director to have another conversation with organizations who take interns and now my son can be in the program next year and only needs to sign a covid waiver and prove he has the normal “titters”(goofy word but I think it means antibodies). I was inches from calling that Ohio attorney and sue if the schools and all the facilities as my son is a straight a student and has no behavioural problems on record.
At the end of the day this report IS important - but let’s discuss how we can use it instead of giving the appearance that we aren’t reading our own forum and just posting the same thing over and over. With other posts I’ve ive seen mods with different takes on the same thing or impacts - but this is just copy paste. Tia for listening.
This is huge information. It needs to stay up for all to see, so that it may be spread all over like a virus (hue hue hue).
I’m glad this helped your Son’s future, and good for you sticking it to those edu-faggs.
Ha ha, titters is a verb. The word is "titers," one t.