When anti gun “experts” want to debate you
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (137)
sorted by:
...yeah they use M4s? which is basically the same thing?
My point is that the term "assault" has a very specific meaning in military terms, and so a weapon being called an "assault rifle" would make perfect sense, AR-15 or not, it's a rifle, that has a set of characteristics, to serve a specific purpose.
Should we bend over and stop using the term because leftist retards were programmed to think it's bad?
I've never used the term "assault" in front of anything, as anything can be used to assault someone. An AR-15 is for targets or hunting or anything else you want it for. It's not just for "assault."
The M4 is not "basically the same thing." Military weapons are fully automatic. The AR-15 is semi-automatic, way different. Look it up.
...Yeah they are made to be semi-auto only, but the platform is the exact same, look it up.
Hey listen, you can keep obeying the media's commands and stop using the term, I really dgaf
It's a senseless term. I have assault fists. I have an assault ball bat. I have an assault car. I have an assault slingshot.
I don't care what the "media" says. I don't even have a TV.
BTW, the M4 is a gas-operated carbine and has nothing in common with the AR-15 but a similarity in looks, which doesn't count.
Yeah but it's a viable term, that's all I'm saying, any weapon can be an assault weapon, like you say yourself, so why not a rifle?
The term "sturmgewehr" referred to the Stg 44 a particular rifle not a class of rifles.